Factors Affecting Attendance at Bowl Games During the BCS Era

Abstract

Six independent variables combined in a formula that explains 82.2 percent of the variance in attendance (r2 = .822) in all 271 college football bowl games that have been played in the past 10 years. This is despite the fact that during a recent explosion in new bowl games and the creation of the Bowl Championship Series (BCS), attendance to these traditional post-season football exhibitions has varied from 5,494 for the 2004 Silicon Valley Football Classic to 94,392 for the 2001 Rose Bowl. These six variables, out of 11 that were tested, each showed a relationship to attendance that was statistically significant at the 0.01 alpha level (p > 0.01). They include the seating capacity of the stadium (Stadium), the average home game attendance of the participating teams (AHAtt), the age of each bowl game (Age), the winning percentages of the participating teams (Wpct.), the travel distance between the representative institutions and the sites of the bowl games (Distance) and the number of days that elapsed between the participating teams’ final regular season or conference championship game and the bowl game itself (Notice). When the researcher studied only the bowls that were at least six years of age (n = 194), where the attendance track record of the individual bowls could be used as an independent variable, a formula of five independent variables that explain 91 percent of the variance (r2d = .910) was developed. All five variables had a relationship with attendance that was statistically significant at the 0.01 alpha level (p > 0.01). The formula included the attendance average of each bowl game over the previous five years (FiveAtt), Stadium, Distance, Wpct and AHAtt.

Introduction

It would be difficult to find a decade in the 106-year history of college football bowl games in which more dramatic changes have occurred in the major college football postseason. The number of bowl games has increased more than 50 percent from 22 in 1998 to 34 in 2008. The Bowl Championship Series (BCS) has dramatically increased revenues for the elite-level bowl games, and payouts for their participants. The growth of conference championship games and other games being played on the first Saturday in December has decreased the amount of notice academic institutions and fans have in finding out which bowl games their teams will be participating.

Attendance has also taken on an added importance because the growth in number of non-BCS bowl games has created a “clutter” of bowl games on television, creating a potential for a saturated market.

While the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) does not have an official national championship event for its Division One Football Bowl Subdivision (D1-FBS), the fact that there has been only one bowl game a year that has had an effect on the national championship (in eight out of the past 10 years) makes new marketing approaches all the more necessary for even more bowl games. Bowls such as the Cotton Bowl, which helped determine the national champion in 1978 and hosted the No. 2-ranked team in 1984; the Holiday Bowl, which hosted the No. 1-ranked team in 1984; and the Citrus Bowl (now the Capital One Bowl), which hosted the United Press International’s (UPI) recognized national champion in 1991; were left out of the BCS when it formed in 1998.

The surge in bowl certification has also led to an increasing number of non-traditional bowl teams participating in bowl games. These teams have little or no track record of bowl attendance and fans that are not accustomed to making postseason bowl travel plans. In some cases, football programs that either did not even exist or play at the NCAA Division 1-A level 10 years before the BCS started have participated in non-BCS bowl games during the BCS era.

These facts all indicate a need to research bowl attendance data. The increase in the number of bowls means that 271 such games have been played during the BCS era, enough to create a valid sample for research purposes.

Review of Literature

Many studies have been conducted regarding spectator attitudes and preferences in sporting events, although most have been based on survey data as opposed to fan behavior. A need to study spectator attitudes and preferences based on behavior instead of surveys arises not only from the practicality of obtaining this data (the NCAA lists attendance figures for all bowl games in a record book stored in a PDF file on its website) but also because a ticket to a sporting event differs from other products and the decision to attend an athletic event or support its participants differs from other types of consumer decisions. These decisions are emotionally-based (Hardy et al, 2003), so depending on the rational mind in a survey and the limited number of responses that can be obtained through survey data creates some disadvantages compared to data based on spectator behavior.

Definition of Terms

Bowl Championship Series (BCS)
A partnership involving the Rose Bowl, FedEx Orange Bowl, Tostitos Fiesta Bowl, Allstate Sugar Bowl, Notre Dame and six collegiate athletic conferences (ACC, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, PAC 10 and Southeastern) to produce an unofficial national championship game for D1-FBS college football and provide the best possible matchups in four major bowl games.
Bowl Games
Special exhibition, All-Star or championship games played at the end of the regular football season. For the purpose of this study, the term will be used in reference to games played after the regular season by D1-FBS teams. As of the end of the 2007 season, there are 32 such games played each year.
National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)
The largest governing body of intercollegiate athletics in the United States.
NCAA Division One
The most competitive level of athletics in the NCAA, with a varying number of schools that usually exceeds 300.
NCAA Division One Football Bowl Subdivision (D1-FBS)
A body of Division One college football teams that play a season culminating in bowl games for 64 of its members. The membership number varies, but usually exceeds 100.

Methodology

Using bowl game attendance as the dependent variable, the researcher analyzed 11 independent variables that theoretically would have an effect on the number of people who attended a bowl game. For the second formula, the researcher analyzed the same 11 independent variables plus one additional independent variable. The researcher used stepwise linear regression analysis as a research method and Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) 16.0 as the instrument.

Selection of Subjects

The researcher collected data from all 271 bowls that took place during the BCS era, from December of 1998 to January of 2008. For the second formula, the researcher used data from only those bowl games that were at least six years old at the time they were played (n = 199).

Variables

Dependent

Attendance: The number of spectators who attended each individual bowl game, as reported in the NCAA Football Record Book (NCAA.com, see Table 1).

Table 1
Bowl Attendance

Bowl Attendance
1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Alamo 60780 65380 60028 65232 50690 56226 65265 62000 65875 66166
Aloha 46451 40974 24397 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Armed Forces N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 38028 27902 33505 32412 40975
BCS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 74628 79651
Capital One 63584 62011 66928 59693 66334 64565 70229 57221 60774 69748
Champs Sports N/A N/A N/A 28562 21689 26482 28237 31470 40168 46554
Chick-fil-A 72876 73315 73614 71827 68330 75125 69332 65620 75406 74413
Cotton 72611 72723 63465 72955 70817 73928 75704 74222 66777 73114
Emerald N/A N/A N/A N/A 25966 25621 30653 25742 40331 32517
Fiesta 80470 71526 75428 74118 77502 73425 73519 76196 73719 70016
Gator 70791 43416 68741 72202 73491 78892 70112 63780 67704 60243
GMAC N/A 34200 40300 40139 40646 40620 40160 35422 38751 36932
Hawaii N/A N/A N/A N/A 31535 29005 39662 26254 43435 30467
Holiday 65354 57118 63278 60548 58717 61102 66222 65416 62395 64020
Houston N/A N/A 33899 53480 44687 51068 27235 37286 N/A N/A
Humanitarian 19664 29283 26203 23472 30446 23118 28516 30493 28652 27062
Independence 46862 49873 36974 45627 46096 49625 43000 41332 45054 47043
Insight 36147 35762 41813 40028 40533 42364 45917 43536 48391 48892
International N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 26717 31455
Las Vegas 21429 28227 29113 30894 30324 25437 29062 40053 44615 40712
Liberty 52192 54866 58302 58968 55207 55989 58355 54894 56103 63816
Meinecke N/A N/A N/A N/A 73535 51236 73238 57937 52303 53126
MicronPC.com 44387 31089 28359 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Motor City 32206 44863 52911 44164 51872 51826 52552 50616 54113 60624
Music City 41248 59221 47119 46125 39183 55109 66089 40519 68024 68681
New Mexico N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 34111 30467
New Orleans N/A N/A N/A 27004 19024 25184 27253 18338 24791 25146
Oahu 46451 40974 24187 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Orange 67919 70461 76835 73640 75971 76739 77912 77773 74470 74111
Outback 66005 54059 65229 66249 65101 65372 62414 65881 65601 65601
Papajohns.com N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 32023 35258
Poinsettia N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 36842 29709 39129
Rose 93872 93731 94392 93781 86848 93849 93468 93986 93852 93923
Seattle N/A N/A N/A 30144 38241 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Silicon Valley N/A N/A 26542 30456 10132 20126 5494 N/A N/A N/A
Sugar 76503 79280 64407 77688 74269 79342 77349 74458 77781 74383
Sun 46612 48757 49093 47812 48917 49894 51288 50426 48732 49867
Texas N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 52210 62097

Source: NCAA
N/A (not applicable) means the bowl game did not exist during the indicated season.

Independent

For the whole group (n = 271)

Age of the bowl (Age): The number of times the bowl game has been played, including the year in question (Table 2). In 2006, the BCS stopped rotating its four bowls as being designated championship games and instead added a fifth bowl, the BCS Championship, on Jan. 8 each year to be hosted by one of the four BCS bowl committees. Two such games have been played during the period of this study, but the age of the BCS title game (1 and 2) would not be reflected in attendance. So in these particular games, the age of the host committee’s bowl game is also used as the age of the BCS Championship game. For example, the 2007 BCS title game was the first one of its kind, but since it was hosted by the Fiesta Bowl Committee, it is listed in this study as being the same age as the Fiesta Bowl (35).

Table 2
Age of the Bowls

Current Bowls Age (in 2007-’08) Discontinued Bowls Final Year Age (in final year)
Rose 106 Aloha 2000-’01 19
Orange 73 Houston 2005-’06 6
Sugar 73 Micron PC.com 2000-’01 10
Cotton 71 Silicon Valley 2004-’05 5
Sun 71 Oahu 2000-’01 3
Gator 61 Seattle 2002-’03 2
Capital One 60
Liberty 48
Chick-fil-A 39
Fiesta 36
Indy 31
Holiday 29
Outback 21
Insight 18
Champs Sports 17
Vegas 15
Alamo 14
Human 11
Motor 11
Music 10
GMAC 9
New O 7
Emerald 6
Hawaii 6
Meinecke Car Care 6
Armed 5
Poinsettia 3
BCS Championship* 2 (35 and 73 in the study)
International 2
New Mexico 2
Papajohns.com 2
Texas 2

*For the purpose of this study, the age of each BCS Championship game will be recorded as the same age as the BCS bowl hosting the event.

Average Home Attendance (AHAtt): The average number of spectators that attended the regular-season home games of the participating teams. The average home attendance for each team is averaged together for this variable (Table 3).

Table 3
Average Home Attendance

Bowl Average Home Attendance (averaged between two participating teams)
1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Alamo 47643.0 84813.0 55688.0 55383.0 63621.0 75292.0 75840.5 94200.0 79545.0 95562.0
Aloha 45336.0 38311.5 44969.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Armed Forces N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 32126.5 23594.0 29364.5 32321.5 63136.0
BCS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 97752.5 98864.5
Capital One 81782.5 61890.5 96364.0 108375.5 95091.0 75327.5 80803.0 83356.0 77631.5 100326.0
Champs Sports N/A N/A N/A 49084.5 60325.5 46012.0 41942.5 64320.5 52425.0 56265.0
Chick-fil-A 64689.0 58061.5 65243.0 69016.0 76478.0 90558.5 73771.5 68445.0 79489.5 82717.0
Cotton 57412.5 67272.5 78927.5 68044.5 84680.0 50690.5 90571.0 65995.0 85053.5 64969.5
Emerald N/A N/A N/A N/A 51317.5 36617.5 34149.5 46571.5 72743.5 46318.5
Fiesta 93702.0 92284.0 56975.5 46700.5 86513.5 75990.0 42856.0 92906.0 57507.0 72629.0
Gator 60641.5 42517.0 65618.5 66101.5 65147.5 51720.5 69693.0 53058.0 54695.0 55867.5
GMAC N/A 34163.0 30571.5 31976.5 32131.0 32589.5 29299.0 34858.0 22859.0 20309.5
Hawaii N/A N/A N/A N/A 35655.5 31299.0 28703.5 21769.0 45575.5 35937.5
Holiday 62051.0 59820.5 63654.5 77765.5 47513.0 58335.0 58421.0 71382.5 70151.5 74009.5
Houston N/A N/A 39252.5 55841.5 35099.5 39772.0 44552.0 38979.5 N/A N/A
Humanitarian 18925.0 30684.5 35604.0 50292.5 35955.0 37497.0 50635.5 34770.5 29318.0 43285.5
Independence 44674.0 60746.5 60268.5 63742.0 67509.5 57652.5 28630.0 66615.5 66636.0 71413.5
Insight 55735.5 46736.0 41444.0 44840.0 40431.5 50168.0 58564.5 47170.5 51540.5 38514.0
International N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 19499.0 28374.0
Las Vegas 15165.8 16350.0 18483.0 22080.2 26235.4 27997.4 28799.0 28966.0 31154.0 33898.2
Liberty 45323.0 26705.5 33633.0 50013.5 29137.0 31889.5 35515.0 31066.5 48770.0 46657.0
Meinecke N/A N/A N/A N/A 54330.5 59810.5 47824.0 45895.0 33275.0 35400.0
MicronPC.com 51571.5 45804.0 47050.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Motor City 32233.5 46929.5 24725.0 26924.0 31865.9 24823.5 31664.5 25442.0 21800.0 39048.5
Music City 60857.5 57248.5 50019.5 64580.0 51268.5 81844.5 64721.5 54909.0 70161.0 73645.5
New Mexico N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 23743.5 23380.0
New Orleans N/A N/A N/A 21434.5 21665.5 28681.0 22074.0 23121.5 17785.0 22705.5
Oahu 58505.0 35576.0 70379.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Orange 66644.0 97115.5 77953.0 64498.5 64300.0 70642.0 84880.5 93791.5 36998.5 56508.5
Outback 77134.5 74794.0 89830.5 93073.0 97880.5 77987.5 87557.0 80495.5 106678.0 92832.5
Papajohns.com N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 33695.0 28483.5
Poinsettia N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 31180.0 26348.5 38605.0
Rose 75568.5 63909.5 67897.0 62468.5 56617.5 94361.0 97059.5 87072.5 100753.0 71174.0
Seattle N/A N/A N/A 46609.5 39716.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Silicon Valley N/A N/A 41500.5 58259.0 41144.7 47619.5 24140.0 N/A N/A N/A
Sugar 75897.5 65622.0 71841.5 71843.5 84143.0 87088.0 74100.0 74494.0 86503.5 68130.0
Sun 44040.0 44689.0 72995.5 44611.5 63932.5 50924.5 63095.0 48372.5 48374.0 56007.5
Texas N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 43903.0 25486.5

Attendance Per Mile (APM): The Average Home Attendance of each team, divided by the number of miles between the bowl’s host city and the city where each academic institution is located, averaged together. An example is in Figure A.

2007 Insight Bowl: Oklahoma State vs. Indiana

Distance from Stillwater, Okla. (home of Oklahoma State University.) to Phoenix, Ariz. (site of the bowl) = 1085.64 miles

Oklahoma State’s Average Home Attendance = 40,024

Oklahoma State’s APM = 40,024/1085.65 = 36.87

Distance from Bloomington, Ind. (home of Indiana University) to Phoenix = 1,747 miles

Indiana’s Average Home Attendance = 37,004

Indiana’s APM = 21.18

2007 Insight Bowl’s APM = (36.87+21.18)/2 = 29.03

Figure A. Example of Attendance Per Mile (APM) Variable.

BCS Status (BCS): The variable that separates BCS bowls from non-BCS bowls, under the hypothesis that a BCS bowl will normally draw higher attendance. The value of “1” is assigned to BCS bowls while “0” is assigned to non-BCS bowls.

Championship Status (CStatus) — The status of a game as it pertains to the unofficial national championship of D1-FBS football. For this study, the BCS-designated national championship game is given a value of “1” and all other bowl games a value of “0” (Table 4).

Table 4
BCS Bowls

Bowl Year Winning Team in Bold, Championship Games in Italics
BCS 2006-’07 Florida Ohio State
BCS 2007-’08 LSU Ohio State
Fiesta 1998-’99 Tennessee Florida State
Fiesta 1999-’00 Nebraska Tennessee
Fiesta 2000-’01 Oregon State Notre Dame
Fiesta 2001-’02 Oregon Colorado
Fiesta 2002-’03 Ohio State Miami
Fiesta 2003-’04 Ohio State Kansas State
Fiesta 2004-’05 Utah Pittsburgh
Fiesta 2005-’06 Ohio State Notre Dame
Fiesta 2006-’07 Boise State Oklahoma
Fiesta 2007-’08 Oklahoma West Virginia
Orange 1998-’99 Florida Syracuse
Orange 1999-’00 Michigan Alabama
Orange 2000-’01 Oklahoma Florida State
Orange 2001-’02 Florida Maryland
Orange 2002-’03 USC Iowa
Orange 2003-’04 Miami Florida State
Orange 2004-’05 USC Oklahoma
Orange 2005-’06 Penn State Florida State
Orange 2006-’07 Louisville Wake Forest
Orange 2007-’08 Virginia Tech Kansas
Rose 1998-’99 Wisconsin UCLA
Rose 1999-’00 Wisconsin Stanford
Rose 2000-’01 Washington Purdue
Rose 2001-’02 Miami Nebraska
Rose 2002-’03 Oklahoma Washington State
Rose 2003-’04 USC Michigan
Rose 2004-’05 Texas Michigan
Rose 2005-’06 Texas USC
Rose 2006-’07 USC Michigan
Rose 2007-’08 USC Illinois
Sugar 1998-’99 Ohio State Texas A&M
Sugar 1999-’00 Florida State Virginia Tech
Sugar 2000-’01 Miami Florida
Sugar 2001-’02 LSU Illinois
Sugar 2002-’03 Georgia Florida State
Sugar 2003-’04 LSU Oklahoma
Sugar 2004-’05 Auburn Virginia Tech
Sugar 2005-’06 West Virginia Georgia
Sugar 2006-’07 LSU Notre Dame
Sugar 2007-’08 Georgia Hawaii

Distance (Distance): The number of miles between the bowl’s host city and the city where each participating team is located (Table 5). The travel distance of each team is averaged out for this variable. The distances were found through the internet using Mapquest.com for mainland bowls and Ask.com for the Aloha, O’ahu and Hawaii bowls.

Table 5
Distance

Bowl Mean of Two Teams’ Travel Distances in Miles
1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Alamo 982.46 912.34 1,081.26 765.05 1,147.07 1,167.58 921.44 1,177.24 600.90 912.34
Aloha 2,930.00 3,807.00 4,000.50 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Armed Forces N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 849.07 1,003.34 388.53 774.47 1,205.70
BCS Title Game N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,982.42 495.28
Capital One 1,117.34 631.92 823.29 901.23 732.99 746.85 975.12 863.40 1,196.24 631.92
Champs Sports N/A N/A N/A 783.90 985.59 937.58 828.90 1,198.63 952.28 1,264.36
Chick-fil-A 292.31 205.01 263.38 244.75 433.94 169.08 501.81 596.95 243.41 116.10
Cotton 375.48 264.93 669.21 261.56 319.94 401.79 513.02 466.01 671.07 468.80
Emerald N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,020.38 2,157.90 1,964.73 1,609.41 1,510.00 1,694.69
Fiesta 1,880.06 1,646.11 1,582.88 1,240.15 2,151.54 1,556.28 1,648.40 1,910.65 1,022.55 1,590.78
Gator 683.30 351.37 489.32 359.76 736.91 741.77 461.25 661.00 552.40 1,005.90
GMAC N/A 717.02 362.91 794.15 700.53 689.82 649.35 1,068.07 489.05 811.33
Hawaii N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,105.00 1,949.00 2,181.00 3,654.50 1,459.00 3,848.50
Holiday 989.72 1,415.66 1,141.56 1,280.59 970.32 1,257.22 769.09 1,175.80 952.31 835.25
Houston N/A N/A 923.12 179.86 470.37 1,011.63 943.21 626.77 N/A N/A
Humanitarian 1,232.12 940.64 612.92 2,106.12 698.79 1,845.16 1,547.59 1,331.75 1,633.05 1,448.64
Independence 460.90 381.80 309.81 584.59 564.92 445.68 818.13 696.13 414.47 735.66
Insight 1,738.43 1,801.57 1,798.01 1,777.19 1,690.28 1,423.95 1,571.16 1,225.81 1,226.59 1,416.23
International N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 439.50 502.67
Las Vegas 1,318.14 408.33 668.78 345.28 421.74 766.57 527.43 472.05 647.41 323.58
Liberty 1,003.56 723.58 766.93 997.44 817.06 944.98 1,137.04 1,161.31 588.30 471.04
Meinecke N/A N/A N/A N/A 324.03 359.91 504.73 377.72 651.57 437.13
Micron PC.com 406.00 1,151.93 1,293.62 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Motor City 349.84 1,010.91 297.73 157.79 385.69 191.29 368.26 466.09 359.43 246.14
Music City 331.14 531.73 416.63 709.39 706.60 462.30 565.14 714.33 287.00 353.53
New Mexico N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 524.47 511.44
New Orleans N/A N/A N/A 1,026.25 684.29 477.72 334.72 287.86 330.37 609.61
Oahu 3,012.50 1,270.50 4,658.50 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Orange 883.07 1,086.26 991.30 707.28 2,106.81 240.85 2,119.11 868.32 948.15 1,205.45
Outback 971.59 764.38 756.62 756.62 649.45 701.57 899.16 701.57 887.37 997.65
Papajohns.com N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 587.35 352.64
Poinsettia N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,924.81 1,675.89 1,730.69
Rose 990.34 1,163.52 1,617.19 2,117.25 1,231.63 1,122.54 1,806.68 695.08 1,122.54 1,004.08
Seattle N/A N/A N/A 1,757.49 1,574.78 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Silicon Valley N/A N/A 759.95 1,260.29 1,296.04 245.97 2,267.72 N/A N/A N/A
Sugar 676.85 610.31 701.90 438.10 463.21 395.50 599.06 344.90 535.07 2,375.18
Sun 706.00 1,521.90 1,117.54 1,509.80 1,598.51 1,521.90 949.15 1,151.98 1,384.94 1,693.86
Texas N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,172.12 131.63

Source of data: Mapquest.com and ask.com. N/A ( not applicable) indicates the game was not played in that particular year.

Improved Winning Percentage (Impct): The regular season winning percentage (including a conference championship game, when applicable) of each team minus its winning percentage from the previous season (including a bowl game, when applicable). The two scores are averaged for this variable (Figure B). It is designed to measure how a team performed compared to expectation, something that would theoretically affect the enthusiasm of the fans and influence their decision to travel.

Improved Winning Percentage:

Regular Season Winning Percentage – Previous year’s total winning percentage

2007-’08 BCS Championship Game: Ohio State vs. LSU

Ohio State

2007 Regular Season = 11-1 = .917

2006-’07 Season = 12-1 = .923

Improved Winning Percentage = .917-.923 = -.006

LSU

2007 Regular Season = 11-2 = .846

2006-’07 Season = 11-2 = .846

Improved Winning Percentage = .846 – .846 = 0

2007-’08 BCS Championship Improved Winning Percentage:

(-.006+0)/2 = -.003

Figure B. Example of Improved Winning Percentage

Market Strength (Market): A measurement of the support for college football in a participating team’s area based on the number of D1-FBS institutions are located in the same state as the participating team. For example, a team from Texas would have a market strength rating of 10 because there are 10 D1-FBS teams in the state of Texas (Table 6). A team from Oklahoma would have a market strength rating of three for the same reason. Therefore, a bowl game played between the University of Tulsa and Texas A&M would have a market strength rating of 6.5.

Table 6
Market Strength

Bowl Market Strength (averaged between the two participating teams)
1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Alamo 3.0 6.5 2.0 6.0 2.0 3.0 5.5 3.0 6.0 6.5
Aloha 2.5 3.0 1.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Armed Forces N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.0 5.0 6.0 3.0 5.0
BCS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.5 6.5
Capital One 3.5 6.0 4.5 4.5 3.5 3.0 3.5 2.5 1.5 6.0
Champs Sports N/A N/A N/A 4.0 26.0 5.0 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.0
Chick-fil-A 2.0 2.5 3.5 4.5 3.0 3.0 7.0 6.0 2.0 4.0
Cotton 6.5 6.0 3.0 2.5 7.5 2.5 7.0 7.0 3.0 1.5
Emerald N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.5 7.0 2.0
Fiesta 5.5 2.5 3.0 2.5 7.5 5.0 3.0 6.0 2.5 2.5
Gator 3.0 4.5 2.0 4.5 4.5 2.0 4.5 2.5 2.0 6.0
GMAC N/A 7.5 6.5 3.5 2.0 5.0 6.0 9.0 5.5 5.5
Hawaii N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 1.5 3.5
Holiday 1.5 2.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 6.0 8.5 2.5 8.5 6.0
Houston N/A N/A 7.5 10.0 3.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 N/A N/A
Humanitarian 2.5 2.0 6.0 3.5 2.0 2.5 4.5 1.5 4.5 4.5
Independence 6.5 3.0 6.5 3.0 2.0 1.5 5.0 1.5 3.5 3.5
Insight 1.5 2.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.5 3.0 1.5 5.5 3.5
International N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.5 2.5
Las Vegas 6.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 4.5 2.0 4.0 5.0 2.5 5.0
Liberty 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 6.5 3.0 2.5 5.0 6.0 5.0
Meinecke N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.0 2.5 3.0 6.0 1.5 3.0
MicronPC.com 6.0 2.5 3.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Motor City 2.0 2.5 5.0 8.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 6.0 4.5 4.5
Music City 3.0 2.5 2.5 1.5 1.5 2.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 4.5
New Mexico N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.5 2.0
New Orleans N/A N/A N/A 6.5 9.0 7.0 6.5 2.5 7.0 5.5
Oahu 2.5 1.5 2.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Orange 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 7.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 2.0
Outback 3.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 4.5 1.5 4.5 3.5 2.5
Papajohns.com N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.0 5.0
Poinsettia N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.5 6.5 2.5
Rose 4.0 4.0 3.0 7.0 2.5 6.0 7.5 8.5 6.0 5.0
Seattle N/A N/A N/A 4.5 3.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Silicon Valley N/A N/A 5.0 6.0 4.5 7.0 3.5 N/A N/A N/A
Sugar 9.0 4.5 7.0 4.0 4.5 4.0 3.0 2.0 4.5 1.5
Sun 8.5 1.5 4.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 3.0 5.0 1.5 4.5
Texas N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.5 10.0

Sources: U.S. Department of Education N/A ( not applicable) indicates the game was not played in that particular year.

Notice (Notice): The number of days between the date of a team’s last regular season or conference championship game and the date of its bowl game. The notice for the two teams is averaged together for this variable. The theory is that the longer notice fans have, the more likely they are to travel to a bowl game (Table 7).

Table 7
Notice

Bowl Notice (averaged between the two participating teams)
1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Alamo 31.0 35.0 33.5 35.0 28.0 34.0 35.5 36.0 39.0 39.0
Aloha 31.0 31.5 30.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Armed Forces N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 20.5 30.0 27.0 28.5 37.5
BCS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 44 44.0
Capital One 33.5 35.0 37.0 31.0 39.0 33.0 39.0 41.0 37.0 42.0
Champs Sports N/A N/A N/A 22.5 30.0 30.0 24.0 31.0 34.0 34.0
Chick-fil-A 33.0 37.5 34.5 30.0 31.0 37.5 34.0 30.5 35.0 37.0
Cotton 31.0 27.0 33.5 38.5 33.0 38.5 32.0 44.0 37.0 35.0
Emerald N/A N/A N/A N/A 31.0 39.5 33.0 36.5 28.5 30.5
Fiesta 37.0 42.0 40.5 31.0 34.0 34.0 35.0 40.5 33.5 32.0
Gator 33.5 31.5 40.5 31.0 35.5 33.0 39.5 30.0 30.0 41.5
GMAC N/A 29.0 26.0 22.5 14.5 17.0 27.0 27.0 37.5 39.5
Hawaii N/A N/A N/A N/A 24.5 22.5 23.5 25.0 25.5 29.5
Holiday 33.0 39.0 38.0 30.5 31.0 35.0 29.5 36.5 35.0 31.0
Houston N/A N/A 36.0 28.0 27.0 31.0 28.5 42.0 N/A N/A
Humanitarian 34.0 40.0 40.0 34.0 38.0 38.5 38.0 36.5 37.0 34.5
Independence 37.5 35.0 37.5 30.5 28.5 32.5 26.0 36.0 36.5 36.5
Insight 32.0 35.0 37.0 35.0 29.5 30.5 33.5 31.5 41.0 41.0
International N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 43.0 39.5
Las Vegas 24.5 28.0 27.0 31.0 21.5 25.0 26.0 33.0 27.0 21.0
Liberty 30.5 37.5 42.0 30.5 31.0 36.0 30.5 28.5 31.0 32.0
Meinecke N/A N/A N/A N/A 28.0 28.0 36.5 31.5 32.5 35.0
MicronPC.com 27.5 40.0 36.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Motor City 25.5 30.5 32.0 28.5 22.5 28.0 28.5 27.5 28.5 32.0
Music City 34.5 35.5 34.5 30.5 30.0 39.0 44.5 37.5 34.0 37.0
New Mexico N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 24.5 24.5
New Orleans N/A N/A N/A 24.0 17.5 19.0 18.0 24.0 23.5 23.5
Oahu 27.0 31.5 29.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Orange 38.5 35.0 39.0 39.0 40.0 33.0 31.0 38.0 31.0 36.5
Outback 37.5 38.0 44.0 41.5 36.0 36.5 38.5 40.0 41.0 38.0
Papajohns.com N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 28.0 28.0
Poinsettia N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 26.0 21.0 22.5
Rose 34.0 42.0 44.0 37.0 25.0 33.0 39.0 32.5 37.0 38.0
Seattle N/A N/A N/A 26.0 33.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Silicon Valley N/A N/A 39.5 30.0 28.5 34.5 40.0 N/A N/A N/A
Sugar 34.5 42.0 34.5 32.0 28.5 29.0 30.0 30.0 39.5 34.5
Sun 36.5 41.0 37.5 37.0 38.0 42.5 38.0 34.0 30.5 33.5
Texas N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 33.0 34.0

Source of data: Division 1A Historical Scores, jhowell.net. N/A ( not applicable) indicates the game was not played in that particular year.

November Winning Percentage (Novpct): The winning percentage of a team in games played during November or the first week of December (Table 8).

Table 8
November Winning Percentage

Bowl November Winning Percentage (averaged between the two participating teams)
1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Alamo 0.875 0.333 0.500 0.625 0.425 0.375 0.500 0.583 0.167 0.500
Aloha 0.500 0.666 0.333 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Armed Forces N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.875 0.500 0.625 0.458 0.625
BCS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.000 0.733
Capital One 0.625 0.750 0.666 0.667 0.875 0.675 1.000 0.667 0.800 0.667
Champs Sports N/A N/A N/A 0.875 0.750 0.292 0.583 0.625 0.625 0.533
Chick-fil-A 0.583 0.583 0.833 0.576 0.800 0.875 0.750 0.775 0.833 0.666
Cotton 0.633 0.500 0.875 0.750 0.625 0.625 0.417 0.500 0.708 0.775
Emerald N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.433 0.500 0.833 0.583 0.625 0.625
Fiesta 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.875 0.875 1.000 1.000 0.775
Gator 0.875 0.625 0.583 0.500 0.375 1.000 0.500 0.750 0.600 0.666
GMAC N/A 0.833 0.500 0.567 0.650 0.750 0.708 0.583 0.775 0.900
Hawaii N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.567 0.550 0.650 0.800 0.650 0.750
Holiday 0.833 0.666 0.833 0.625 0.875 0.750 0.833 0.875 0.417 0.583
Houston N/A N/A 0.500 0.333 0.625 0.625 0.708 0.833 N/A N/A
Humanitarian 1.000 0.750 0.833 0.500 0.625 0.625 0.750 0.708 0.500 0.625
Independence 0.375 0.542 0.576 0.625 0.250 0.650 0.708 0.500 0.125 0.167
Insight 0.667 0.500 0.642 0.708 0.625 0.575 0.500 0.500 0.833 0.458
International N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.583 0.583
Las Vegas 0.875 0.666 0.625 0.750 0.625 0.625 0.333 0.500 0.625 0.625
Liberty 0.875 1.000 0.833 0.775 0.666 1.000 1.000 0.576 0.750 0.833
Meinecke N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.750 0.550 0.708 0.675 0.750 0.500
MicronPC.com 0.708 1.000 0.500 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Motor City 1.000 0.667 0.875 0.750 0.800 0.550 0.708 0.625 0.625 0.300
Music City 0.500 0.333 0.500 0.542 0.833 0.417 0.167 0.500 0.542 0.417
New Mexico N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.467 0.500
New Orleans N/A N/A N/A 0.708 0.917 0.875 0.600 0.500 0.900 0.750
Oahu 0.667 0.708 0.333 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Orange 0.708 1.000 1.000 0.868 1.000 0.675 1.000 0.625 0.800 0.875
Outback 0.583 0.417 0.333 0.708 0.750 0.750 0.500 0.666 0.583 0.733
Papajohns.com N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.750 0.750
Poinsettia N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.542 0.833 0.833
Rose 0.708 1.000 0.750 0.833 0.708 1.000 0.917 1.000 0.750 1.000
Seattle N/A N/A N/A 0.600 0.292 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Silicon Valley N/A N/A 0.875 0.700 0.750 0.400 0.750 N/A N/A N/A
Sugar 0.708 1.000 0.875 1.000 0.800 0.900 1.000 0.875 0.875 1.000
Sun 0.666 1.000 0.667 0.433 0.708 0.708 0.666 0.583 0.567 0.425
Texas N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.583 0.750

Stadium Size (Stadium): The seating capacity of the stadium when used for football games (Table 9).

Table 9
Stadiums

Bowl Years Stadium Capacity
Alamo 1993-Present Alamo Dome 65000
Aloha 1982-2000 Aloha Stadium 50000
Armed Forces 2003-Present Amon G. Carter Stadium 43000
BCS 2006-’07 University of Phoenix Stadium 73000
BCS 2007-’08 Louisiana Superdome 72500
Capital One 1986-Present Florida Citrus Bowl 65438
Champs Sports 2002-Present Florida Citrus Bowl 65438
Chick-fil-A 1993-Present Georgia Dome 71990
Cotton 1938-Present Cotton Bowl 71252
Emerald 2002-Present AT&T Park 38437
Fiesta 1971-’06 Sun Devil Stadium 73397
Fiesta 2007-Present University of Phoenix Stadium 73000
Gator 1997-Present Jacksonville Municipal Stadium 77000
GMAC 1999-Present Ladd-Peebles Stadium 40048
Hawaii 2002-Present Aloha Stadium 50000
Holiday 1978-Present Qualcomm Stadium 66000
Houston 2000-2005 Reliant Stadium 69500
Humanitarian 1997-Present Bronco Stadium 30000
Independence 1976-Present Independence Stadium 48947
Insight 1989-’99 Arizona Stadium 57803
Insight 2000-’05 Bank One Ballpark 42915
Insight 2006-Present Sun Devil Stadium 73397
International 2007-Present Rogers Center 53506
Las Vegas 1992-Present Sam Boyd Stadium 40000
Liberty 1965-Present Liberty Bowl Memorial Stadium 62598
Meinecke 2002-Present Bank of America Stadium 73298
MicronPC.com 1996-2001 Joe Robbie Stadium 77823
Motor City 1997-’01 Pontiac Silverdome 80368
Motor City 2002-Present Ford Field 65000
Music City 1998-Present LP Field 68000
New Mexico 2006-Present University Stadium 38634
New Orleans 2001-Present Louisiana Superdome 72500
Oahu 1998-’00 Aloha Stadium 50000
Orange 1996-Present Dolphin Stadium 77823
Outback 1998-Present Raymond James Stadium 65500
Papajohns.com 2006-Present Legion Field 72000
Poinsettia 2005-Present Qualcomm Stadium 66000
Rose 1943-Present Rose Bowl 91887
Seattle 2001-’02 Seahawks Stadium 67000
Silicon Valley 2000-’04 Spartan Stadium 30000
Sugar 1975-’05, 2007-Present Louisiana Superdome 72500
Sugar 2006 Georgia Dome 71990
Sun 1963-Present Sun Bowl Stadium 50426
Texas 2006-Present Reliant Stadium 69500

Data is from NCAA.com. N/A ( not applicable) indicates the game was not played in that particular year.

Winning Percentage (Wpct) — The percentage of games won by each team in the regular season (including conference championship games, when applicable), averaged together (Table 10).

Table 10
Winning Percentage (averaged between the two participating teams)

Bowl 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Alamo 0.792 0.739 0.773 0.591 0.615 0.708 0.636 0.636 0.625 0.625
Aloha 0.682 0.545 0.545 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Armed Forces N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.920 0.545 0.591 0.625 0.625
BCS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.962 0.881
Capital One 0.784 0.784 0.739 0.780 0.708 0.760 0.818 0.826 0.843 0.708
Champs Sports N/A N/A N/A 0.591 0.576 0.542 0.545 0.610 0.671 0.676
Chick-fil-A 0.773 0.682 0.727 0.576 0.718 0.750 0.682 0.826 0.718 0.667
Cotton 0.697 0.626 0.748 0.735 0.833 0.750 0.693 0.576 0.763 0.756
Emerald N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.679 0.583 0.727 0.591 0.542 0.583
Fiesta 0.958 1.000 0.864 0.871 1.000 0.810 0.864 0.826 0.923 0.833
Gator 0.818 0.697 0.864 0.682 0.769 0.708 0.818 0.576 0.763 0.708
GMAC N/A 0.727 0.773 0.689 0.708 0.837 0.727 0.727 0.654 0.679
Hawaii N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.676 0.599 0.610 0.697 0.676 0.708
Holiday 0.833 0.773 0.818 0.780 0.724 0.792 0.682 0.746 0.750 0.792
Houston N/A N/A 0.610 0.591 0.583 0.625 0.655 0.773 N/A N/A
Humanitarian 0.682 0.693 0.773 0.591 0.728 0.583 0.727 0.739 0.583 0.625
Independence 0.545 0.636 0.576 0.591 0.542 0.666 0.606 0.591 0.500 0.500
Insight 0.682 0.636 0.682 0.648 0.667 0.641 0.545 0.591 0.542 0.542
International N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.625 0.583
Las Vegas 0.591 0.697 0.564 0.591 0.561 0.625 0.545 0.591 0.708 0.667
Liberty 0.846 0.727 0.818 0.875 0.818 0.784 0.955 0.576 0.676 0.676
Meinecke N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.683 0.625 0.636 0.591 0.750 0.667
MicronPC.com 0.682 0.636 0.591 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Motor City 0.777 0.864 0.610 0.727 0.679 0.635 0.652 0.564 0.638 0.599
Music City 0.682 0.545 0.591 0.682 0.638 0.583 0.545 0.591 0.667 0.583
New Mexico N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.583 0.583
New Orleans N/A N/A N/A 0.500 0.561 0.708 0.591 0.545 0.583 0.583
Oahu 0.731 0.652 0.591 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Orange 0.773 0.826 0.958 0.864 0.875 0.826 1.000 0.788 0.881 0.881
Outback 0.682 0.636 0.682 0.682 0.576 0.708 0.818 0.682 0.739 0.760
Papajohns.com N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.625 0.667
Poinsettia 0.591 0.667 0.708 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rose 0.909 0.773 0.818 0.958 0.840 0.875 0.864 1.000 0.875 0.792
Seattle N/A N/A N/A 0.701 0.542 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Silicon Valley N/A N/A 0.682 0.696 0.599 0.558 0.682 N/A N/A N/A
Sugar 0.878 1.000 0.839 0.830 0.808 0.923 0.917 0.871 0.833 0.917
Sun 0.606 0.727 0.606 0.682 0.500 0.708 0.682 0.576 0.679 0.708
Texas N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.708 0.583

For Bowl games that are more than five years old (n = 194)

Five-year Average Attendance (FiveAtt) — The average attendance of a bowl game for the past five years (Table 11).

Table 11
Five-year Average Attendance

Bowl 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Alamo 53129.60 56142.40 60397.20 59483.40 61394.40 60422.00 59511.20 59488.20 59882.60 60011.20
Aloha 43592.00 44080.40 43302.80 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Armed Forces N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
BCS* N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 74872.20 76662.60
Capital One 70171.00 68396.60 66559.80 65786.00 65031.20 63710.00 63906.20 65549.80 63608.40 63824.60
Champs Sports N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 62519.00 65549.80
Chick-fil-A 66795.40 68687.40 70370.00 70927.80 72568.80 71992.40 72442.20 71645.60 70046.80 70762.60
Cotton 65886.00 66437.20 66938.20 67988.40 68193.80 70514.20 70777.60 71373.80 73525.20 72289.60
Emerald N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 29662.60
Fiesta 72114.80 73755.00 73266.60 72379.40 74181.80 75808.80 74399.80 74798.40 74952.00 74872.20
Gator 56165.20 56882.40 53125.60 57833.40 61853.20 65728.20 67348.40 72687.60 71695.40 70795.80
GMAC N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 39181.00 40373.00 39397.40 39119.80
Hawaii N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 33978.20
Holiday 53624.40 56273.60 55806.60 58252.00 59411.80 61003.00 60152.60 61973.40 62401.00 62770.40
Houston N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 42073.80 N/A N/A
Humanitarian N/A N/A N/A N/A 24655.50 25813.60 26504.40 26351.00 27209.00 28245.00
Independence 40344.20 42952.80 47479.00 45106.80 45959.00 45086.40 45639.00 44264.40 45136.00 45021.40
Insight 45341.60 42756.00 40884.00 41045.80 40627.00 38856.60 40100.00 42131.00 42475.60 44148.20
International N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Las Vegas 15165.80 16350.00 18483.00 22080.20 26235.40 27997.40 28799.00 28966.00 31154.00 33898.20
Liberty 40229.40 46448.40 50765.60 52946.40 54907.40 55907.00 56666.40 57364.20 56682.60 56109.60
Meinecke N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 61649.80
MicronPC.com 39691.40 40865.60 36916.80 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Motor City N/A N/A N/A N/A 43496.80 45203.20 49127.20 50665.00 50206.00 52195.80
Music City N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 46579.20 49351.40 50725.00 49405.00 53784.80
New Mexico N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
New Orleans N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 23360.60 22918.00
Oahu N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Orange 74557.20 71833.80 69575.40 70502.80 72571.40 72965.20 74729.20 76219.40 76407.00 76573.00
Outback 57864.60 60535.80 59070.80 59054.00 61671.60 63328.60 63202.00 64873.00 65003.40 64873.80
Papajohns.com N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Poinsettia N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rose 101088.00 99615.00 97912.00 96770.00 95399.00 92525.00 92520.00 92468.00 92386.00 92401.00
Seattle N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Silicon Valley N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sugar 73515.40 73728.60 74339.80 73164.60 73033.40 74429.40 74997.20 74611.00 76621.20 76639.80
Sun 47080.20 47633.00 47262.00 47257.40 48275.60 48238.20 48894.60 49400.80 49667.40 49851.40
Texas N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

*Figures are based on last five bowls hosted by the local committee
Data source: NCAA.com
N/A (not applicable) indicates the game was not played in that particular year.

Results

When all bowl games (n=271) were counted, six variables combined to explain 82.2 percent of the variance in attendance (r2d = .822). The variables were: Seating Capacity (Stadium), Age of the bowl (Age), Average Home Attendance of the participants (AHAtt), number of miles in travel between the location of the institutions and the bowl games (Distance), and the number of days elapsed from the end of the regular season or conference championship game to the bowl game itself (Notice), as shown in Table 12.

Table 12
Model Summary

Model R r2 Adjusted r2 Std. Error of the Estimate
1 .743a .552 .551 12822.102
2 .841b .707 .704 10399.231
3 .884c .782 .779 8983.648
4 .897d .804 .801 8524.124
5 .903e .816 .813 8279.997
6 .907f .822 .818 8156.106
a. Predictors: (Constant), Stadium
b. Predictors: (Constant), Stadium, Age
c. Predictors: (Constant), Stadium, Age, AHAtt
d. Predictors: (Constant), Stadium, Age, AHAtt, Wpct
e. Predictors: (Constant), Stadium, Age, AHAtt, Wpct, Distance
f. Predictors: (Constant), Stadium, Age, AHAtt, Wpct, Distance, Notice

Each variable had a relationship to attendance that was statistically significant at the 0.01 alpha level (p > 0.01), as noted in Table 13.

Table 13
Coefficients and Relationships

Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) -5233.704 3280.305 -1.595 .112
Stadium .944 .052 .743 18.214 .000
2 (Constant) 4910.494 2794.302 1.757 .080
Stadium .636 .049 .501 12.887 .000
Age 318.709 26.845 .461 11.872 .000
3 (Constant) -2534.098 2535.494 -.999 .318
Stadium .527 .044 .415 11.947 .000
Age 237.622 24.682 .344 9.627 .000
AHAtt .294 .031 .327 9.598 .000
4 (Constant) -18954.895 3822.348 -4.959 .000
Stadium .485 .043 .382 11.401 .000
Age 190.531 24.920 .276 7.646 .000
AHAtt .270 .029 .301 9.216 .000
Wpct 30760.395 5564.072 .184 5.528 .000
5 (Constant) -16058.380 3779.075 -4.249 .000
Stadium .448 .042 .353 10.583 .000
Age 189.036 24.209 .274 7.808 .000
AHAtt .271 .029 .302 9.515 .000
Wpct 34305.556 5473.019 .205 6.268 .000
Distance -3.142 .764 -.112 -4.113 .000
6 (Constant) -24353.011 4626.876 -5.263 .000
Stadium .455 .042 .358 10.885 .000
Age 178.672 24.093 .259 7.416 .000
AHAtt .238 .030 .265 7.904 .000
Wpct 34631.879 5392.212 .207 6.423 .000
Distance -3.240 .753 -.115 -4.303 .000
Notice 299.769 99.308 .089 3.019 .003

Dependent Variable: Attendance

So a formula that would explain the variance in bowl attendance would look something like this:

S = Seating Capacity

A = Age of the bowl

T = Average Home Attendance of the Participating teams (The sum Average Home Attendance of each team divided by two)

W = Winning Percentage (the sum of the regular season winning percentages of the two participating teams, including conference championship games when applicable, divided by two).

D = Travel distance (the sum of the travel distance between each participating institution’s home city and the city hosting the bowl game, divided by two)

N = Notice (the sum of the number of days between the last regular season game or conference championship game of each team and the bowl game, divided by two)

Bowl Attendance = .455S + 172.672A + 34631.879W – 3.24D + 299.769N – 24353.011.

On bowls that were at least six years old (n = 194), the five-year attendance average was included as an independent variable. Five variables; Five Year Average Attendance (FiveAtt, Travel Distance (Distance), Winning Percentage (Wpct), Average Home Attendance (AHAtt), and Seating Capacity (Stadium); combined to explain 91 percent of the variance in attendance (r2d = .910), as can be observed in Table 14.

Table 14
Model Summary Bowls that are at least Six Years Old

Model R
VAR00021 > 5 (Selected) r2 Adjusted r2 Std. Error of the Estimate
1 .939a .883 .882 5893.063
2 .946b .894 .893 5604.919
3 .949c .901 .899 5451.683
4 .952d .906 .904 5301.487
5 .954e .910 .908 5202.987
a. Predictors: (Constant), FiveAtt
b. Predictors: (Constant), FiveAtt, Distance
c. Predictors: (Constant), FiveAtt, Distance, Wpct
d. Predictors: (Constant), FiveAtt, Distance, Wpct, AHAtt
e. Predictors: (Constant), FiveAtt, Distance, Wpct, AHAtt, Stadium

As in the previous formula, all variables had a relationship with attendance that was statistically significant (Table 1) at the 0.01 alpha level (p < 0.01).

Table 15
Coefficients and Relationships for bowls at least six years old.

Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) 6456.892 1446.943 4.462 .000
FiveAtt .917 .024 .939 37.981 .000
2 (Constant) 9579.045 1533.840 6.245 .000
FiveAtt .913 .023 .935 39.696 .000
Distance -2.996 .650 -.109 -4.610 .000
3 (Constant) 2699.321 2491.405 1.083 .280
FiveAtt .846 .029 .867 28.691 .000
Distance -3.401 .643 -.123 -5.290 .000
Wpct 15344.128 4450.253 .105 3.448 .001
4 (Constant) 537.570 2502.378 .215 .830
FiveAtt .788 .033 .807 23.629 .000
Distance -3.253 .627 -.118 -5.190 .000
Wpct 15823.608 4329.875 .108 3.655 .000
AHAtt .082 .024 .097 3.452 .001
5 (Constant) -3309.442 2798.385 -1.183 .238
FiveAtt .690 .047 .707 14.603 .000
Distance -2.909 .627 -.105 -4.641 .000
Wpct 15173.014 4255.479 .104 3.566 .000
AHAtt .090 .023 .106 3.847 .000
Stadium .142 .050 .117 2.868 .005

The formula for bowls that are at least six years old would include:

S = Seating Capacity

T = Average Home Attendance of the Participating teams (The sum Average Home Attendance of each team divided by two)

W = Winning Percentage (the sum of the regular season winning percentages of the two participating teams, including conference championship games when applicable, divided by two).

D = Travel distance (the sum of the travel distance between each participating institution’s home city and the city hosting the bowl game, divided by two)

F = Average attendance over the past five years.

Attendance = 0.690F – 2.909D + 15173.014W + 0.09T + .142S – 3309.442

Discussion

Bowl committees will publicly state that they invite the most deserving teams more so than those that will bring the highest attendance. It is easy to see why the latter option would be more tempting. On table 12, where all bowls are included, it shows that average home attendance accounts for 7.5 percent of the variance in bowl attendance, while winning percentage only accounts for 2.2 percent. This can be figured from the r2d numbers on step 2, a formula that does not include Average Home Attendance but explains 70.7 percent of the variance, but step 3, which adds Average Home Attendance explains 78.2 percent of the variance, a difference of 7.5 percent. Step 4, which adds winning percentage, explains 80.4 percent of the variance, a difference of 2.2 percent. In Table 14, where only bowls that are at least six years old are studied, winning percentage accounts for 0.7 percent of the variance while Average Home Attendance accounts for 0.5. Notice, which theoretically would become an issue with the increasing number of bowl games played before Christmas and the later invitation dates brought about by the BCS and conference championship games, was not a factor in the bowls that were six years old or more and only explained .6 % of the variance in bowls overall.

Future Studies

Since the adjusted r2 for the first formula is .818, this means the average accuracy of any prediction on bowl attendance would be 81.8 percent (.908/90.8 percent on the second formula). Future studies could focus on bowls that exceed their expected attendance with a qualitative look at the marketing methods used by these bowls compared to other bowls that do not fare as well. Conferences and teams whose bowl appearances draw larger crowds than expected could also be studied.

The second formula, that takes five-year attendance averages into account, could be used by bowl committees to set goals for attendance each year. Since the bowls do not know until December who their participants will be, setting a goal based on this formula’s expectation and using it to measure improvement would be more reasonable.

References

Hardy, Stephen, Bernard J. Mullin and William A. Sutton (2003). Sports Marketing (pp. 55-75). Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics.

Official Website of the NCAA. Retrieved May 13, 2008 from Ncaa.com.

Ask.com. Retrieved May16, 2008 from Ask.com.

Mapquest. Retrieved May 23, 2008 from Mapquest.com.

2017-08-07T11:42:34-05:00July 7th, 2008|Sports Management, Sports Studies and Sports Psychology|Comments Off on Factors Affecting Attendance at Bowl Games During the BCS Era

Active Versus Passive Recovery in the 72 Hours After a 5-km Race

Abstract

We do not clearly understand what type and duration of recovery works best after a hard run to restore the body to peak racing condition. This study compared 72 hr of active recovery after a 5-km running performance with 72 hr of passive recovery. A sample of 9 male and 3 female runners of above-average ability completed 3 trials within 6 days. Each 5-km trial was followed by 72 hr of passive recovery (PAS) or 72 hr of active recovery (ACT), a counterbalanced protocol. The 2 initial 5-km trials constituted separate PAS and ACT baselines. Mean finishing times did not differ significantly (p = 0.17) between ACT (19:35 + 1.5 min) and baseline (19:41 + 1.7 min); nor was there significant difference (p = 0.21) between PAS (19:30 + 1.5 min) and baseline (19:34 + 1.6 min). Average heart rate for PAS (177.9 + 6.3 b/min) was significantly higher (p = 0.04) than baseline (175.4 + 6.5 b/min), but ACT average heart rate (175.9 + 6.6 b/min) was significantly lower (p = 0.02) than baseline (178.9 + 6.4 b/min). For PAS, perceived rate of exertion at ending (19.8 + 0.6) was significantly greater (p = 0.01) than baseline (19.3 + 0.9), yet for ACT, perceived rate of exertion at ending (19.6 + 0.8) did not differ significantly (p = 0.17) from baseline (19.7 + 0.7). During PAS trials, 2 individuals ran a mean 12.0 + 2.8 s slower, 2 individuals ran a mean 33.0 + 21.0 s faster, and 8 individuals ran within 5.1 + 2.5 s of their first run. During the ACT trials, 1 participant ran 13.0 s slower, 3 participants ran a mean of 34.7 + 13.5 s faster, and 8 nonresponders ran within 5.5 + 2.7 s of baseline. Results indicate that 72 hr of passive and active recovery result in similar mean 5-km performance.

(more…)

2016-10-19T11:20:16-05:00July 7th, 2008|Sports Coaching, Sports Exercise Science, Sports Management, Sports Studies and Sports Psychology|Comments Off on Active Versus Passive Recovery in the 72 Hours After a 5-km Race

Program and Facility Emergencies in Youth Sports, Part II: Dealing with the Event

Communication
plays an integral role in the prevention of youth sport injuries, as the
evidence in Part I of this paper suggested. Communication regarding
expectations, policy and procedures, and post-injury protocol can facilitate a
safe youth sport environment. However, preventing youth sport injuries also
involves several other areas, such as protective equipment, strength and
cardiovascular conditioning, environmental and facility management, proper
coaching, and proper nutrition and hydration. According to the American College
of Sports Medicine (1993), 50% of injuries that occur in children and
adolescents are preventable. Even when steps are taken to ensure safe
participation in youth sport programs, however, injuries will happen; what happens
before, during, and after an emergency can make the difference in the eventual outcome
of injuries.

Dealing with
emergencies in youth sport requires sufficient preparation and planning to
ensure prompt resolution of the event. Prevention measures preclude injury or
have the potential to reduce the severity of injuries and should thus be
considered most effective (Roberts, 1998). League administrators and youth
coaches must ask and answer several questions: Who is the most qualified
individual to treat injuries? Are the persons dealing with the emergencies
adequately prepared for a variety of emergency situations? Are coaches properly
trained to coach? Are there mechanisms in place for prompt medical care? Coming
prepared with this kind of information prior to any emergency can promote
optimal medical care and prevent litigation.

Coach and Parent Education

To make decisions
in answer to the questions just reviewed, league administrators must understand
the qualifications of coaches. The National Association of Sports and Physical
Education (NASPE) has developed standards of fundamental competency that
communities, school systems, private leagues, parents, and athletes should require
of coaches. League administrators and parents are responsible for ensuring that
youth coaches are appropriately qualified to supervise the sport in question and
to maintain a safe playing area and environment. Moreover, coaches should be
required to complete (at a minimum) a community course in first aid and CPR;
there are several sport safety courses available as well that are recommended
for all youth coaches.

A critical
component of caring for an injured athlete is familiarity with the medical
history and condition of the athlete. Before activity commences in any sport, each
athlete should undergo a pre-participation physical examination. This examination
should be required of all athletes prior to participation and should be
comprehensive. Necessary checks include a medical physical to assess heart and
lung function; a medical history to identify any pre-existing problems and
family health history; a musculoskeletal examination assessing alignment,
strength, flexibility, and laxity; a “vitals” examination ensuring heart rate,
blood pressure, height, and weight are appropriate for the individual; body
composition assessment; vision screening; and finally, a sport performance
assessment
determining whether the individual’s cardiovascular condition
and strength are appropriate for the anticipated exertion.

First Aid Equipment

In addition to
familiarity with each athlete’s health status, it is also key to have
appropriate emergency medical supplies available. Most youth leagues provide
first aid kits or small athletic trainer kits for each team. When preparing a
kit for a team in a given sport, it is crucial to plan for a broad scope of
needs, stocking the kit properly to address all of them. Kits must be prepared before
each practice or contest in order to be of reliable use. Having the correct
supplies could be the difference in delivering essential care to an injured
athlete appropriately.

Although a wide
variety of first aid supplies can be helpful depending on the sport, there are
items of common value across sports. Key items include the following:

  1. information such as phone
    numbers, release forms, and emergency cards (as well as paper and pen)
  2. instruments including paramedic
    scissors, tape cutters, tweezers, fingernail clippers, fingernail files,
    and a microshield or CPR mask
  3. bandages and related supplies including
    athletic tape, tape adherent, underwrap, elastic tape, band-aids, gauze
    pads, ace wraps, and petroleum jelly
  4. splinting supplies including slings,
    safety pins, finger splints and other splints, and crutches
  5. eye care kit including contact
    solution, contact case, saline, and a pocket mirror
  6. miscellaneous items including
    rubber gloves, antiseptic cleaning solution, insect repellent, water
    bottles, ice chests and/or coolers, tongue blades, and felt or foam
    padding material

This list is not exhaustive but it provides
the foundation of a well-stocked sport first aid kit. In some sports, kits may
need to be augmented with items such as mouth pieces, nose plugs, analgesic rub,
hand cream, sun glare, and feminine hygiene products. Organization of the kit
is important in emergency situations when first aid must be provided quickly.
Similar items should be stored in the same area of the kit; there should be
nothing unnecessary in the kit obscuring needed items that need to be located
quickly following an injury.

Administrators and
supervising coaches must make certain that each youth coach is qualified to use
and comfortable in using all first aid kit supplies. A general rule is not to
pack in the kit any supply with which the coach or coaches are uncomfortable.
It is important to designate one person to maintain the first aid kit and order,
as needed, items replenishing the kit’s supply.

Although they can
be expensive, first aid kits are highly recommended for all youth sport
programs. League commissioners typically determine who purchases kits and supplies
to stock them. When there is no funding for emergency medical supplies, asking
health care facilities and drug stores to donate supplies is a potential
course; firefighting and other emergency departments may also be willing to
help. League administrators and/or coaches are ultimately responsible for
providing players with the best possible first aid should they be injured; the
expense of good first aid kits is, ultimately, relative.

After an Injury

Providing care is a
top priority in an emergency. Care can be provided best and most quickly when
those involved remain calm while activating appropriate medical assistance. When
a young athlete may be injured, it must always be remembered that nothing less
than his or her well-being is at stake. It is therefore better to err on the side
of cautiousness, when in doubt about the injury or first aid, by seeking
additional medical assistance immediately. It should also be remembered that
children’s and adolescents’ bodies are distinct from the adult’s and cannot
always be treated in the same way. Therefore, it is always recommended that a
young athlete seek medical attention from a physician for any injury that does
not improve in a short period.

Fortunately, most
injuries in youth sports are not complicated and can be resolved with little
medical intervention. Often, the best approach is what has been called, for
ease of memory, RICE, which stands for rest, ice, compression,
and elevation. Rest the injured area by supporting it with a sling, splint,
or crutches. Ice the injury for approximately 20 min at a time. Compress the
area with an elastic bandage to control swelling. Finally, elevate the area
above the level of the heart, also to manage swelling. These steps comprise a standard
and long-advocated treatment for many sport injuries.

When an emergency
has occurred and first aid has been rendered, notification of certain
individuals becomes necessary, when those individuals are not present at the
sport facility. Again, parent phone numbers and the league commissioner’s phone
number, along with emergency numbers, should be kept easily available in the
front of the first aid kit. It is also recommended that useful emergency information
is provided as a courtesy to each visiting team, for example on a reference
card. Having access to emergency numbers and directions to nearby hospitals is
greatly appreciated by teams unfamiliar with an area.

Conclusion

All sports pose
some injury risk. While coaches and administrators should make every effort to
keep that risk as low as possible, they must also ensure that appropriate care
is available in the event an injury does occur. Injury-prevention programs are
advocated by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and are readily
available to the general public (Purvis & Burke, 2001). Completing the programs
can help prepare youth coaches to manage emergency situations. Furthermore,
youth sports leagues are well advised to maintain a written emergency plan that
staff know how to implement. The plan should be reviewed yearly by league
officials, coaches, parents, and care providers from the local community’s emergency
medical service. It is important that this plan be reviewed yearly due to the
typically high number of changes in coaching staff each year.

References

American
College of Sports Medicine (1993). The prevention of sports injuries of
children and adolescents. Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise, 25(8),
1–7.

National
Association of Sport and Physical Education. National standards for athletic
coaches.
Reston, VA: Author.

Purvis,
J. M., & Burke, R. G. (2001). Recreational injuries in children: Incidence
and prevention. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, 9(6),
365–374.

Roberts,
W. O. (1998). Keeping sports safe: Physicians should take the lead. The
Physician and Sports Medicine, 26
(5).

2017-08-07T11:43:32-05:00July 7th, 2008|Sports Coaching, Sports Exercise Science, Sports Management, Sports Studies and Sports Psychology|Comments Off on Program and Facility Emergencies in Youth Sports, Part II: Dealing with the Event

Sport and Spirituality: A Comparative Perspective

Abstract

Responding to recent highly publicized sport scandals that so often tarnish the character of athletics, this writing defends the innate sanctity and redeems the potential of sport by exploring sport as a spiritual enterprise. Spirituality, generally conceptualized at three levels of connection (to self, others, and a higher being or purpose), is explored using 10 dominant themes of the world’s sacred scriptures. Examples of these 10 themes from the domain of sport and athletics are offered, as follows: supreme being and the mystery of sport; self and play in the zone; spiritual paths and practice; knowledge–wisdom and creativity–innovation in sport; the “good life” and the team; love and service as sportsmanship; devotion and worship through love of the game; fate and free will in “miracle and madness”; death and the “big picture”; and the spiritual sage and the sport hero.

Sport and Spirituality: A Comparative Perspective

My sport-and-spirituality venture began when I was a daring toddler chinning my way up the splendid chair-leg pedestals of my mother’s fine dining room furniture, eventually reaching the summit and setting up camp, temporarily, on the sacred heights of the table sanctuary. It was an enchanting escape, fashioning new and intriguing possibilities. Later such impulses would be disciplined by years of gymnastics training, following the singular path of a 4-in. balance beam or swinging unwittingly on two wooden spindle bars. Now, as a soccer mom, I watch as my children devoutly absorb themselves in the disciplined challenge and exhilarating excitement of sport and athletics. Life is good.

I never suspected inner rumblings among the community of believers until one night at dinner our family was discussing a recent barrage of player suspensions mounting on previous dismissals of athletes from a nearby university basketball program. My son drolly asked, “Who hasn’t assaulted someone?” His amused and also cynical rebuttal beckoned me to justify and defend the integrity of an activity to which I and many others have eagerly surrendered hours of dedicated practice; an activity leading to moments of unexpected and unrelenting joy, bewildering us with setbacks and conversion; an activity of obvious physical attributes but also imparting spiritual value to generations of players. I began to consider the message that was not being communicated from the sport pulpit to its eager and interested congregation. The spiritual essence of sport is rarely linked with the physical performance and competitive outcomes of sport in the context of popular sport promotion. Nevertheless, in its most fundamental and pure form, sport is spiritual. The spiritual is defined as that which raises the human condition to a higher level of personal awareness and interpersonal consciousness and heightened realization of a grand scheme of things.

To see the soul of sport, we must look beyond both the superficial, if spectacular, physical feats and the much-publicized aggression, anger, and greed in sport. Because sport is spiritual as well as physical, it can lead an athlete to personal transfiguration, revival of communal understanding, and redemption of life’s purpose and possibilities. The precisely executed tennis topspin, the gutsy 50-ft platform dive, the harmoniously choreographed triangle offense, the undeniable magic of the miracle game or perfect golf round can offer the deepest kind of meaning. Sport’s contribution to spiritual advancement cannot be underestimated. Just imagine where we would be had Adam and Eve tossed or teed off that shiny red orb from the Garden of Eden.

Each person’s spiritual venture involves three levels of connection: to the self (inner strength), to relationships (our undeniable union with others), and to a higher being or purpose. It is important to preserve the distinction between spiritual venture and organized religion; nevertheless, the quest for spiritual relevance is often grounded in the practices, teachings, and rituals of the world’s many religions. Religious scripture renders verbal descriptions and explanations to clarify complex spiritual themes. While the sacred scriptures of the world’s religions read differently, their messages and themes are often similar. They have been said to share 10 common themes: the idea of a supreme being, of the self, of the spiritual path, of knowledge and wisdom, of the “good life,” of love and service, of devotion and worship, of fate and free will, of death, and of the spiritual sage (Freke, 1998). This paper draws analogies between these themes and sport not to make sport a religion, but to present sport as an intriguing, insight-generating, exhilarating, and joyful means of awakening a lethargic soul, grasping an unresponsive heart, and enlightening feeble and fragile imagination to robust possibilities and convincing realities.

Supreme Being and the Mystery of Sport

Some would accuse popular culture of proclaiming sport as God. Spiritual text, however, tells us that God is one, yet God is all—a profound but confusing mystery. In depicting the supreme being with a human face, theologians of many faiths have tried to draw that being nearer to us and make it easier for us to conceptualize God (Freke, 1998). Capturing this powerful image in our hearts can be profound when we recognize and appreciate the wonder of God in our everyday lives. Recognition may come in something as simple and subtle as a rainbow’s faint appearance, or in something as intense and marvelous as a friend’s first struggling words after brain surgery. Recognition of God in our everyday lives may also arise at the unexplainable synchrony of a heavyweight boxer’s feather-light, floating grace and stinging punch; or at the gritty determination of the Korean breaststroker in the 2001 Paralympic Games sleekly slithering through the water like a squid, powerfully thrusting himself through each armless stroke with the force of his legs, bracing for each poolside head-butt turn of the race. Inexplicable skills and exquisite performances in sport expose the wonder of a higher power. As the Christian Bible’s book of Matthew offers, “With God all things are possible” (Matt. 19:26, New International Version).

The Self and Play in the Zone

One demanding scriptural theme that challenges our essential nature is the perplexing premise that God is within us. As expressed in the Christian Bible, “He is not far from each one of us,” for “In him we live and move and have our being” (Acts 17: 27– 28). In the realm of sport, God-within-us is perhaps epitomized in the experience of flow. Also experienced by accomplished artists and musicians, flow is described by many athletes as being “in the zone”: a state of harmonious union of body and mind wherein the two work together effortlessly, leaving the individual with an undeniable feeling that something special has occurred (Jackson & Csikszentmihalyi, 1999). The Chicago Bulls’ Michael Jordan was in the zone, for example, in Game 1 of the 1992 National Basketball Association Finals against Portland, when in the first half he sank six 3-point shots. At the time, reportedly, a broadcast crew member gestured at Jordan to as if to ask, “How did you do that?” In reply, Jordan shrugged the famous shrug acknowledging the wonder and mystery of his “out-of-body” experience, the only part of which he understood was that he couldn’t miss! In flow, there is the uncanny realization that what has been experienced is an undeniable sense of peace (“Classic NBA Quotes,” 2008).

The Spiritual Path and Practice

The spiritual path is humankind’s virtuous attempt to navigate toward a life of personal fulfillment and ultimate discovery, embodied in human compassion. Scriptural texts prescribe various codes, practices, and rituals as learning guides on the sacred journey represented by the spiritual path. Within Buddhism, “the Middle Way” is the prescription for enlightenment (Freke, 1998), as follows:

There are two extremes, O Bhikkhus, which he who has given up the world, ought to avoid. . . . By avoiding these two extremes, the Tathagata has gained the knowledge of the Middle Path which leads to insight, which leads to wisdom, which conduces to calm, to knowledge . . . to Nirvana (Mahavagga, I, 6, 17–18). (p. 48)

Sport, in its fashion, captures the essence of the Middle Way. An athlete’s success is marked by steady, relevant progress on sturdy grounding—neither surrender to the marshy swampland of lethargy nor a dash to the insecure precipice of training obsession. On one hand, those who study flow report that the seemingly effortless performances of accomplished athletes are anchored in hours of practice, careful attention, and critique. On the other hand, those who study the body’s adaptation to sport training warn of a subtle tipping point at which both strength and spirit are diminished: overtraining.

In shaping their unique paths to success, some athletes have demonstrated one extreme or the other. For example, Allen Iverson, a guard with the NBA’s Denver Nuggets, apparently disgruntled with the intense requirements of the training pilgrimage, persistently and nearly to the point of being comical denies the value of practice. In doing so, he discounts not just his own but his teammates’ sacrifices as they have invested themselves in the pilgrimage. Conversely, Olympic runner Suzy Favor-Hamilton chronicled her resurrection from the perils of an unrelenting training schedule (throughout high school and college she never took one day off from running) accompanied by unscrupulous dieting, noting how excess led to plummeting performance, devastating injuries, and psychological burnout.

Surely, the provisional aspect of the journey is the delicate maneuvering and incredible grounding necessary to balance between life’s extremes. Scripturally, the curious balance required constitutes the fascinating effort–grace paradox, whose analogue in athletics is the tension between the bulging muscle of our personal efforts and the supple support of God’s grace. The spiritual journey’s ultimate mystical destination is our realization and understanding that we are where we need to be, always part of the One, and always remembering the One. The scriptures of Islam are among those that address such truth, as in for instance the Hadith of Tirmidhi, which states, “For everything there is an appropriate way of polishing; the heart’s polishing is the remembrance of God” (Freke, 1998, p. 45). For the athlete, sincere preparation for competition marks the sign of the cross, so to speak, reminding us of this silent, polishing communion with God.

Knowledge and Wisdom as Creativity and Innovation in Sport

Where athletics and sport have the potential to score a spiritual “10” is in the leap from prescribed dictates of a spiritual code, to the realm of experiential knowledge and wisdom. When to the insights bestowed by observant teachers and ingenious coaches athletes add personal knowledge gained from playing, they are freed from limited perception. As the Hindu scripture known as the “Ashtavakra Gita” advises, “Give up conceptualizing altogether. Have no beliefs or concepts of any kind. You are the ever-free Consciousness. How can any thinking help you in any way?” (Freke, 1998). As such, the athlete is a rendering of God’s creation. The knowledgeable athlete redefines the boundaries of his or her game. Freed from defined constructs, the competitor is keenly aware of the self, with its strength and spirit, and in the innovative performances fostered by such freedom, sport’s reality is redefined.

Edson Arantes Do Nascimento, the unassuming, average-sized man better known as Pelé, scored 1,280 goals in 1,360 games over a 20-year career (1956–1977) as he revolutionized the game of soccer. Of his incredible speed and balance, tremendous vision, excellent ball control, and powerful, accurate shooting with either foot and with his head, Pelé has said, “It seems that God brought me to Earth with a mission to play soccer” (Gonzalez, n.d.). Track and field star Dick Fosbury stunned spectators at the 1968 Summer Olympics as his unconventional jumping technique led him to a gold medal in the high jump. Fosbury’s “flop” quickly came to replace traditional dive-and-straddle high jump technique. At the 1972 Olympics, Olga Korbut reinvented gymnastics with feats of athleticism never before seen in the sport. Her back flip–catch off the top of the uneven parallel bars revolutionized gymnastics. Like Pelé and Fosbury, Korbut’s skill mastery fashioned new forms and meanings in the sport. This acknowledgement must be made, however, in the context of such scriptural reminders as Zen Buddhism’s cautionary note on recreated knowledge: It is only “a finger pointing at the moon but not the moon itself,” since human knowing can never match God’s greater wisdom (Freke, 1998).

The “Good Life” and the Team

Religions around the world expect a spiritual follower to live a “good life,” endorsing various codes of righteous behavior. Christians hold fast to the imperatives of the “Ten Commandments”; Buddhists adhere to the “Noble Eightfold Path.” Hindus strive to obey their “Laws of Life”; Taoists pursue the “Natural Way.” All of these faiths’ codes of behavior share in common a conviction that a good life is in the making when a person contributes to the perfection and harmony of a larger whole. But here our human vulnerabilities can be harshly exposed. Tolle (2005) translates and describes sin, the opposite of goodness, as “missing the mark, as an archer who misses the target. . . . [T]o sin means to miss the point of human existence. It means to live unskillfully, blindly and thus to suffer and cause suffering” (p. 9). Tolle adds as well that being good requires a shift in consciousness. For the athlete, such a shift of consciousness comprises the humble displacement of self for the benefit of the team.

Athletes who pursue self-aggrandizement (like their counterparts in domains other than sport) will, the scriptures of various faiths agree, be humbled. In sport, the cost of vice is the destruction of the team and the burden of the whole, which is exponentially greater than the burden of each individual. Even as the National Football League legislated against impudence in the sport, the gods may have shown their take on unnecessary celebration, evening the score—no, raising the New York Giants’ score­—in Super Bowl 2008, after Randy Moss’s audacious appropriation of power over the universe, motioning for the seas to part after a late-game score.

Becoming a good sport suggests personal and interpersonal transformation and is necessary to be a true athlete. The concept of moving beyond the individual self to the collective team may be the most challenging aspect of spirituality in power cultures like professional sports. Tolle’s shift in consciousness is a marked change, and interestingly, the word sport can mean (in a definition employed within the biological sciences) “an organism that shows a marked change from the normal type or parent stock, typically as a result of mutation.”

Unfortunately, as is true of sin and disharmony, denying the collective is tremendously destructive to the individual, the community, and the promise of all that is good in sport. The shift from ego focus to collective consciousness in the world of sport relies on humility, repentance, forgiveness, compassion, and more (the spirit not the letter, perfect liberty). The marring and tarnishing of beauty, grace, and accomplishment is a failure of the whole. Marion Jones, in her public confession of her steroid use, asked forgiveness. She earnestly apologized for besmirching the sport that she had trained so hard for and dedicated her life to; in painfully exposing her failure, she paradoxically revealed her inner strength and goodness. Humans cannot know the individual predicaments that other humans face in their lives, and to reestablish harmony requires empathy and an unwillingness to stand in judgment. Public forgiveness was necessary to reunite Jones with the community. As Islamic scriptural text maintains, “The best deed of a great man is to forgive and forget”; or as Judaism’s Talmud phrases it, “When we know we are all one . . . forgiveness is natural” (Freke, 1998).

Love and Service Seen As Sportsmanship

The most seemingly absurd association between spirituality and sport is the notion that the spiritual undertaking of love and service coexists with athletic achievement and success—victory over others. But it is the connection between compassion and sport that can be most inspiring. Sport provides an alternative impression of the clash between collective egos, the us versus them. As Los Angeles Lakers coach Phil Jackson wrote in his book Sacred Hoops, “There has to be another way, an approach that honors the humanity of both sides while recognizing that only one victor can emerge. . . . a wide-angle view of competition that encompasses both opponents as partners in the dance.” Ultimately, Jackson (1995) compares competition and sport to battle, stating that, “The challenge of warriorship is to step out of the cocoon, to step out into space, by being brave and at the same time gentle” (Jackson, 1995). This unconventional model of competition builds not on humiliation, power, and aggression but on honor, respect, and yielding. Such mutual respect and admiration is seen in the world of sport. Steve Nash of the Phoenix Suns, for example, and Dirk Nowitzki of the Dallas Mavericks demonstrate fierce competitiveness while maintaining the integrity of a several-year friendship.

Devotion and Worship Seen As Love of the Game

While healthy competition and sportsmanship define the promise of the sport experience, when athletes play with special reverence for the tradition and legacy of “the game,” they achieve an even higher level of consciousness. Spiritual mystics have long affirmed and expressed the sacredness of life and celestial wonders through dedicated worship and praise. In a similar way, devoted athletes may demonstrate their respect and honor for the game through gestures observed as ritual. Ritual, according to Marty (1998), comprises conscious, voluntary, repetitious and stylized symbolic bodily actions, centered on cosmic structures and/or sacred presences; sport, Marty continues, thus embraces ritual, since “Sports involve sacrifice of energy and limb . . . [and] who sacrifices without ritual?”

In Sacred Hoops, Jackson describes how he adopted Vince Lombardi’s ritual of “crossing the line.” Lombardi, legendary football coach who led the Green Bay Packers to five league championships in his nine years of coaching, asked his players to walk over the line, symbolically confirming their consent and commitment to practice every day. By creating a sacred space with Lakota symbols of balance, harmony, power, prosperity, and good fortune, Jackson similarly established a holy sanctuary within which athletes mindfully attend to the task at hand. Such rituals and symbols establish an atmosphere of mindful attention to purpose. Freke (1998) notes that Judaism’s “Book of the Secrets of Enoch” states, “It is good to go morning, midday, and evening into the Lord’s dwelling, for the glory of your creator. Because every breathing thing glorifies him and every creature visible and invisible returns him praise” (p. 111).

Fate and Free Will and the “Miracle and Madness”

While rituals may help us organize and fashion that which is so vulnerable and unpredictable in our lives, ultimately the spiritual uncertainty of free will and fate emerge. The investment of whatever amount of energy, commitment, and rite does not guarantee success. As Freke (1998) noted, “Human life is the interaction of fate and freedom of choice” (p. 120). Spiritually, we are advised to make choices pursuant to the good life; we are reminded that we cannot control the world and that God is in the driver’s seat. We can only control our responses to what befalls us. Judaism acknowledges the spiritual paradox and mystical truth that fate and human will mysteriously coincide, that life leads us along the road that we have actually chosen. Jewish spiritual text, as cited in Freke, holds that “Everything is foreknown, but man is free” (p. 36). The doctrine of karma, too, explains fate as the outcome of our previous choices. But lightning strikes, and stunning rainbows emerge from dreary skies.

There is no better illustration of this paradox than the miracles and madness of sport—unexplained victories and devastating, unpredictable losses. The United States ice hockey team’s 4–3 victory over the Soviet Union during the 1980 Lake Placid Olympics has been called the “miracle on ice.” The Russian team was in peak form and comprised both mature veterans and ambitious young talent; it had just annihilated the National Hockey League all-star team 6–0 in the deciding game of a challenge series. It was unfathomable that a team of U.S. college players had a chance against such fierce competition. Certainly U.S. players’ strenuous conditioning and meticulous strategic and tactical preparation had an impact, but it has struck many experts that nothing short of a miracle allowed them to emerge victorious (Fitzpatrick, 2008). Observing such turns of event in sport, we realize we are not necessarily in control—an understanding that returns us to the sheer joy of child’s play and surrender to the moment.

Death and the Big Picture (Field of Dreams)

Sacred scripture intimates that by examining our beliefs about and attitudes toward death, we become truly free to live our authentic lives. Similarly for the athlete, the desperation of a defeat, devastation of injury, or struggle of a losing season can bring perspective, making the opportunity to play more pleasurable. Mortality certainly helps define humankind’s place in the big picture; acknowledging it as our own, we become enraptured of the pleasures of participating in life. The Shinto religion offers a scripture (Tenrikyo Ofudesaki 3.41) that says, “All human bodies are things lent by god. With what thought are you using yours?” (Freke, 1998, p. 142). Green Bay Packers quarterback Brett Favre, at 38 playing a sport that most athletes survive in for only a handful of years, has achieved many football mileposts, for example most wins by a starting quarterback, most consecutive games played by a quarterback, and most touchdown passes thrown. But his physical achievements pale next to his fervor to stay in the game despite numerous setbacks. He nearly died in a car accident; was diagnosed with avascular necrosis, a degenerative hip condition; lost his father and also his brother-in-law in accidents; watched his wife battle breast cancer; and saw his hometown ravaged by Hurricane Katrina. Favre admits to behaving recklessly on field and off at points in his past, but we have seen him mature without losing any of his youthful love for of football. Shipnuck (2007) explains that Favre’s favorite career memories are not what might be expected:

‘The funny thing is, it’s not only about the touchdowns and the big victories. If I were to make a list, I would include the interceptions, the sacks, the really painful losses. Those times when I’ve been down, when I’ve been kicked around, I hold on to those. In a way those are the best times I’ve ever had, because that’s when I’ve found out who I am. And what I want to be.’

In confronting our own challenging moments, athletes and the rest of us realize a personal potential that surpasses human understanding and the typical experiences of life. We discover our innate potential and embody the full measure of life’s opportunities.

The Spiritual Sage and the Sport Hero

Occasionally there emerge from among us mortals who, like the society of saints, challenge and inspire us with their lives of transcendence. We are awakened by their selfless compassion and stand in awe of the harmony they create with all others as they accept life on its terms. They are spiritual sages or spiritual heroes, projecting what a human was truly created to be. The dutiful sport hero models the same wholeness in living. According to Buddhist scripture, enlightenment is gained when we see that suffering in life is diminished by moving from the ignorance of separation to the knowledge of wholeness, which is our true enlightened nature. As Freke (1998), explains, the enlightened have “traveled from the ignorance of separation to the further shore of enlightenment . . . concerned with relieving the suffering of others” (p. 166).

Sacred scripture variously affirms that the spiritual sage is characterized by humility and compassion (Jewish, Christian); by detached selflessness (Hindu); and/or by integrity, respectfulness, and unwillingness to stand in judgment of another (East Asian thought generally). The ethical sport hero exemplifies the same qualities. Baseball hall of fall honoree Roberto Clemente came to the Pittsburgh Pirates from humble beginnings as the youngest of seven in a family in Puerto Rico. When he died in the 1972 crash of a plane enroute to deliver relief supplies to survivors of the great earthquake in Nicaragua, his remarkable accomplishments in his sport (lifetime batting average of .371 with 240 homeruns and 1,305 RBI) were preempted by his dedication to others. According to Price (2001), Peter Williams describes Clemente’s martyr-like status as resulting from two characteristics, (a) that Clemente died without warning and (b) his ethical heroism was primarily active:

In other words he died, as he had lived, doing charitable work for the disadvantaged. In this, he was very much a hero in tune with the social activism of his time; and the response to his death, showing an awareness of this, ended by strengthening a heroic image that was already established.” (p. 102)

In offering a perspective on such a state of self-actualization, the Buddhist Diamond Sutra explains that enlightened beings cannot even think of themselves as enlightened, for this would involve the idea of a self, whereas “enlightenment is an impersonal happening, not a personal achievement” (Freke, 1989, p. 170).

As we head into the 2008 Summer Olympic Games, this discussion reminds us of the fundamental nature of sport: its surge of innocent vitality, its ingenuous dance with others, its trusting application of ourselves to the challenge. Among others, Johann Olav Koss, a four-time Olympic speed skating medalist and three-time world record holder, has argued there is a basic human need for play, sport, athletics. Witnessing children confined to an Ethiopian refugee camp playing soccer in the dirt with a rolled-up shirt as ball, he resolved to work on such children’s behalf “until everyone believes in Olympic Aid’s motto: ‘Every child has the right to play’” (Beijing Olympic Organizing Committee, 2008). The Jesuit scholar Hugo Rahner (cited in Lawrence, 2005) in his writings emphasizes the spiritual force of play and sport. “To play,” he explains, “is to yield oneself to a kind of magic . . . to enter a world where different laws apply, to be relieved of all the weights that bear it down, to be free, kingly, unfettered and divine.” In tossing the apple, we play, create, cooperate, challenge, dream, and grow.

Reference List

Beijing Organizing Committee for the Games of the XXIX Olympiad. (n.d.). Olympic stories: Johann Koss. Retrieved May 2, 2008, from
http://en.beijing2008.cn/ education/stories/n214077679.shtml

Favor-Hamilton, S., & Antonio, J. (2004). Fast track: Training and nutrition from America’s top female distance runner. New York: Holtzbrinck.

Fitzpatrick, J. (n.d.). About.com: Hockey—Miracle on ice: American hockey’s defining moment: How the 1980 U.S. Olympic hockey team created its “miracle on ice.” Retrieved May 2, 2008, from
http://proicehockey.about.com/cs/history/a/miracle_on_ice.htm

Freke, T. (1998). The illustrated book of sacred scriptures. New Alresford, Hampshire, England: Godsfield Press.

Gonzalez, O. (n.d.). Latino legends in sports: Edson Arantes “Pele” Nascimento. Retrieved May 2, 2008, from http://www.latinosportslegends.com/Pele_bio.htm

Jackson, P., & Delehanty, H. (1995). Sacred hoops: Spiritual lessons of a hardwood warrior. New York: Hyperion.

Jackson, S. A. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Flow in sports: The keys to optimal experiences and performances. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Lawrence, I. (2005, April 8). The emergence of “sport and spirituality” in popular culture. The Sport Journal, 2(8). Retrieved May 2, 2008, from
http://www.thesportjournal.org/article/emergence-sport-and-spirituality-popular-culture

Marty, M. E. (1998, August). Last word: Ritual in sports, sports as ritual. The Park Ridge Center Bulletin, 5. Retrieved May 2, 2008, from http://www.parkridgecenter.org/Page127.html

National Basketball Association (n.d.). NBA encyclopedia playoff edition: Classic NBA quotes: Michael Jordan. Retrieved May 2, 2008, from
http://www.nba.com/history/Classic_NBA_Quotes_Jordan.html

Price, J. L. (Ed.). (2001). From season to season: Sports as American religion. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.

Shipnuck, A. (2007, December 3). 2007 Sportsman of the Year. Sports Illustrated. Retrieved May 2, 2008, from
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/magazine/specials/sportsman/2007/12/03/sportsman.2007/index.html

Tolle, Eckhart. (2005). A new earth: Awakening to your life’s purpose. New York: Penguin.

2017-08-07T11:44:23-05:00July 7th, 2008|Contemporary Sports Issues, Sports Management, Sports Studies and Sports Psychology|Comments Off on Sport and Spirituality: A Comparative Perspective

National and State Youth Baseball Coaching Requirements: A State Case Study

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the requirements placed on coaches by national and state youth baseball organizations. Administrators from five national youth baseball organizations and from five youth baseball leagues in Hawaii participated in the study (N = 61). A 12-item survey was used to determine the organizations’ requirements pertaining to coaches’ education, certification, experience, and professional growth. Results indicated no requirement by either the national or the Hawaii youth baseball organizations that coaches have a high school diploma. Furthermore, neither the national nor the state organizations required a national coaching certification. Only 6.98% of the national organizations and 11.11% of the Hawaii organizations required coaches to have experience as a player, while 4.65% of the national organizations and 7.41% of the Hawaii organizations required them to have prior coaching experience. Only 44.19% of the national organizations and 55.56% of the Hawaii leagues required background checks for coaches. Coaches’ attendance at coaching training seminars was required by 9.3% of the national and 11.11% of the Hawaii organizations. Clearly, youth baseball coaches in both national and state organizations are subjected to organizational requirements at minimal levels. Based on the results and on the existing literature, the authors recommend a model for certifying youth baseball (and other) coaches.

National and State Youth Baseball Coaching Requirements: A State Case Study

Through sports, youth coaches help parents and teachers develop the whole child or teenager in preparation for life. Sports are an important arena wherein coaches have the wonderful opportunity to guide and nurture the physical, mental, social, and emotional development of youth athletes. Coaching is of great value to society, according to Gilbert, Gilbert, and Trudel (2001), because there are millions of children and teenagers who “establish a segment of themselves in organized sports during a period of their lives that is critical to their personal development.” (p.29)Within the athletic arena, coaches assume the role of educator presenting youth with opportunities to learn and use both sports skills and life skills. But as Martens (2004) has argued, coaching is more than teaching, since “[c]oaches not only guide athletes in learning technical, tactical, and life skills, they also orchestrate and direct their lives in the performance of these skills” (p. vi)

The vast majority of youth programs in the United States rely on volunteers, notably parent-coaches (Wiersma & Sherman, 2005). Because of the volunteer nature of youth coaching, it is not surprising that coaches have various educational and athletic backgrounds (Martens, 2004). Most volunteer coaches receive only limited formal training or education in coaching to prepare them for their respective coaching endeavors (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2001; Gilbert et al., 2001; Gould, Krane, Giannini, & Hodge, 1990; Weiss & Hayashi, 1996). The majority of youth coaches nationally may be inadequately prepared to appropriately nurture children’s physical, mental, social, and emotional development. Research suggests that formal coaching education influences a coach’s ability to affect learning and performance in positive ways (Martens, 2004); coaching education is rarely mandatory (Clark, 2000), despite such findings. Furthermore, the available data describing standards that state and national sports organizations set for youth coaches are limited. The primary purpose of this study was, therefore, to determine these standards, or coaching requirements, in a sample of national youth baseball organizations as well as youth leagues in the state of Hawaii.

Methods

Every administrator (N = 61) at the five national youth baseball organizations and five statewide Hawaiian youth baseball organizations involved in the study completed a survey. These administrators included national directors, regional directors, and state directors, as well as the local presidents from the state leagues. The 12-item survey contained sections on (a) required certification, (b) required play and coaching experience, (c) required continuing professional education, and (d) educational background. Each survey question was designed to elicit a yes response (1) or a no response (2). The instrument’s intent was, first, to obtain from each administrator a description of any coaching certification that was required of or recommended for head baseball coaches by the organization (Questions 1–3). Next, the survey asked about experience head baseball coaches might be required to present, both as players and as coaches, and also whether they underwent any criminal background check (Questions 4–6). Then, the survey asked whether an organization required head baseball coaches to demonstrate professional growth through formal continuing education, and whether mandatory meetings of team parents were (Questions 7–10). Finally, the instrument surveyed the administrators about any education requirements established for head baseball coaches (Questions 11–12) (see Table 1). Frequency distributions and percentages quantifying the administrators’ responses were determined so that the five Hawaii youth baseball leagues could be compared and contrasted. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

Table 1 and Table 2 present descriptive statistics. Concerning the required certification of coaches, results indicate that neither the surveyed national youth baseball organizations nor the surveyed state leagues required any formal certification of head baseball coaches. In addition, according to the administrators, only three national organizations (6.98%) required head coaches to pass CPR and first aid certification examinations before they could act as coaches (see Table 1). One local president of a Hawaii state league similarly required coaches to obtain CPR and first aid certification prior to the season (see Table 2).

Concerning play and coaching experience required of coaches by national and state youth baseball organizations, only 3–5% of the national organizations required their head coaches to have any playing experience or any earlier coaching experience in baseball prior to coaching. Similarly, only 7–11% of the surveyed administrators from Hawaii state leagues reported that league coaches were required to have experience playing or coaching baseball.

In addition, only 44.19% of the national organizations required background checks for head baseball coaches prior to their assignment as coaches. Hawaii league administrators were slightly more likely to require background checks (55.56%), with just over half reporting their organizations required background checks.

Table 1

Number & Percentage of National Organization Administrators’ Yes/No Responses to 12 Items

Requirement Little League (n = 9) PONY (n = 1) Babe Ruth/ Cal Ripken (n=4)
Yes No Yes No Yes
Certification of head coach mandated by national group 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%) 21 (100%) 0 (0%)
Certification mandated by national group may be modified by administrator 9 (100%) 0 (0%) 18 (85.71%) 3 (14.29%) 4 (100%)
CPR/first aid certification of head coach 2 (22.22%) 7 (77.78%) 1 (4.76%) 20 (95.24%) 0 (0%)
Baseball playing experience of head coach 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 3 (14.29%) 18 (85.71%) 0 (0%)
Baseball coaching experience of head coach 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 2 (9.52%) 19 (90.48%) 0 (0%)
Criminal background check for head coach 7 (77.78%) 2 (22.22%) 4 (19.05%) 17 (80.95%) 0 (0%)
Annual examination over rules & regulations for head coach 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 1 (4.76%) 20 (95.24%) 0 (0%)
Academic preparation in coaching for head coach 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 4 (19.05%) 17 (80.95%) 0 (0%)
Seminars in coaching offered to head coach 9 (100%) 0 (0%) 14 (66.67%) 7 (33.33%) 2 (50%)
Mandatory team parent meetings 1 (11.11%) 8 (88.89%) 8 (38.10%) 13 (61.90%) 0 (0%)
High school diploma needed by head coach 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%) 21 (100%) 0 (0%)
College degree needed by head coach 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%) 21 (100%) 0 (0%)

Table 2

Number & Percentage of National and State Administrators’ Yes/No Responses to 12 Items

Requirement National (n = 34) Hawaii (n = 27)
Yes No Yes No
Certification of head coach mandated by national group 0 (0%) 43 (100%) 0 (0%) 27 (100%)
Certification mandated by national group may be modified by administrator 40 (93.02%) 3 (6.98%) 26 (96.30%) 1(3.70%)
CPR/first aid certification of head coach 3 (6.98%) 40 (93.02%) 1(3.70%) 26 (96.30%)
Baseball playing experience of head coach 3 (6.98%) 40 (93.02%) 3 (11.11%) 24 (88.89%)
Baseball coaching experience of head coach 2 (4.65%) 41 (95.35%) 2 (7.41%) 25 (92.59%)
Criminal background check for head coach 19 (44.19%) 24 (55.81%) 15 (55.56%) 12 (44.44%)
Annual examination over rules & regulations for head coach 1 (2.33%) 42 (97.67%) 0 (0%) 27 (100%)
Academic preparation in coaching for head coach 4 (9.30%) 39 (90.70%) 3 (11.11%) 24 (88.89%)
Seminars in coaching offered to head coach 31 (72.09%) 12 (27.91%) 20 (74.07%) 7 (25.93%)
Mandatory team parent meetings 9 (20.93%) 34 (79.07%) 6 (22.22%) 21 (77.78%)
High school diploma needed by head coach 0 (0%) 43 (100%) 0 (0%) 27 (100%)
College degree needed by head coach 0 (0%) 43 (100%) 0 (0%) 27 (100%)

Finally, concerning the professional growth or continuing education of youth baseball head coaches, only a small portion (9.30%) of the national organizations required head coaches to complete any coaching education prior to becoming a head coach, according to surveyed administrators. A similar 11.11% of the state organizations required coaching education for head coaches. While the organizations tended to lack continuing education requirements for head coaches, 80% of the studied organizations at the national level did offer seminars for their coaches (see Table 1), as did 74.07% of the Hawaii baseball leagues (see Table 2).

In addition, 3 of the 5 national organizations did not mandate team parent-coach meetings, and the remaining 2 indicated that only a small number of coaches in the organization held parent meetings at which head coaches addressed team goals and rules, player responsibilities and discipline, and parents’ and coaches’ behavior. The survey data from administrators of Hawaii leagues were similar, with only 22.22% mandating or even offering a limited number of team parent meetings.

Discussion

The results of this study are consistent with the majority of published work, although they do challenge a few earlier findings. Concerning certification, for example, our survey findings support the literature, with no contradictory results obtained: The national organizations and Hawaii organizations require no formal certification of coaches. The present findings furthermore show that the national administrators, collectively, joined the Hawaii local presidents in reporting that the organization or league they represented had autonomy to modify certification requirements. (Nevertheless, according to this study’s results, neither national nor Hawaii youth baseball administrators have created certification requirements for their coaches.)

Findings of the present study diverged from those in the literature, however, in terms of required CPR and first aid certification of coaches. According to earlier published research, no national organization requires CPR and first aid training for coaches. Our survey findings identified three administrators (from the Little League and PONY organizations) who said they required head baseball coaches to become CPR and first aid–certified; in addition, one local president in a Hawaii organization required coaches to obtain such certification prior to the season. This raises a meaningful question: Given that the present study found national and Hawaii administrators alike to affirm their autonomy to modify the certification requirements applied to coaches, why did only four of them deem CPR and first aid certification important enough to mandate?

Concerning the experience requirements established for head coaches, the present results might be described as disturbing. Only a very small percentage (see Tables 1 and 2) of national administrators (6.98%) and Hawaii league local presidents (11.11%) said their organizations required coaches to have played baseball in high school. While play experience does not guarantee that a coach can motivate each player to psychomotor, cognitive, and social growth, coaches who played in high school seem likelier than coaches lacking that background to offer the relevant experiences (and strong knowledge base) that benefit teams. DeRenne’s discussion (1993) of four “I’s” suggests goals for the volunteer parent-coach, all of which are built on the kind of information a former player should possess. According to DeRenne, team members must be informed, instructed, and inspired by the coach if coaching is to be successful; to accomplish these tasks requires good information, for which even the best intentions are no substitute (1993).

Even more disturbing than organizations’ lack of requirements about coaches’ experience as players is their lack of standards concerning prior coaching experience. An astoundingly low 4.56% of national administrators and 7.41% of Hawaii administrators (see Table 1 and Table 2) required their head coaches to have prior baseball coaching experience. First-year head coaches who are appointed or elected “team leader” despite having no athletics background may find the road difficult to navigate; on the other hand, the first-year head coach who is an experienced assistant coach steers clear of many difficulties. It should be remembered that on-the-job training of coaches comes at the expense of players. DeRenne (1993) has also addressed the importance of experience as well as information, writing that knowledge is the sum of information plus experience, and noting that, “[W]ith [k]nowledge comes AWARENESS. If you have good information, practical experience, and have gained some knowledge, you are dwelling more on what can go right and less on what can go wrong” (p. 11)

The present study’s findings furthermore diverged from the literature in terms of background checks for prospective coaches. According to one article on Little League Baseball, the organizations requires of all its coaches, volunteers, or other persons who may regularly contact Little League athletes to be cleared by a sex offender background check (“Criminal and Sex Offender Registry,” 2005). The present findings, however, showed only 77.78% of Little League administrators to require criminal background checks and substance abuse screenings for all prospective coaches. The Little League organization might look to its brother organization, the Police Activities League, or PAL, for a model of responsible administration: PAL demands 100% compliance with its background check policy concerning coaches.

In terms of professional growth or continuing education requirements for youth baseball coaches, the present findings indicate that national and Hawaii organizations send mixed messages to coaching volunteers. There was no annual rules-and-regulations examination for coaches in 97.67% of national organizations and in 100% of Hawaii organizations, according to our findings. Similarly, 90.70% of national organizations and 88.89% of Hawaii organizations did not mandate any coaching seminars or other training sessions, although, interestingly, they did tend to offer coaches optional seminars, clinics, or the like, in hopes of fostering professional growth (72.09% of national organizations, 74.07% of Hawaii organizations).

Finally, concerning coaches’ educational backgrounds, the present study found not one national or Hawaii league administrator who said an organization required head baseball coaches to hold a high school diploma or college degree. While a completed formal education does not in itself guarantee coaching success, diplomas do indicate some degree of responsibility and maturity, qualities that are necessary in those who lead young athletes.

Recommendations

The research findings prompt a strong suggestion to national and state youth baseball organizations that they adopt coaching certification as policy. Ideally, any prospective head coach in any national or state organization would be required to meet uniform certification criteria. Specific certification criteria should include (a) mandatory attendance to coaching training or seminars leading to successful completion of an examination; (b) passing an examination/certification in CPR and first aid; (c) mandatory preseason parent-coach team meetings, (d) high school playing experience, (e) high school diploma; (d) criminal background check extending to substance abuse, as well; (e) high school playing experience; and (f) experience as an assistant baseball coach or head coach in another sport.

Furthermore, it is recommended that the coaches be required to conduct mandatory pre-season meetings with team parents and that the youth baseball organizations each appoint a supervisor responsible to oversee and unify youth baseball policies based on guidelines from the National Alliance of Youth Sports (NAYS, 2005) recommendations. Finally, Wiersma and Sherman’s (2005) eight recommendations for preparing youth sports coaches also merit adoption. These researchers called for NASPE standards to be incorporated into “content that encompasses issues specific to communities” They also advocated league programs that foster mentoring between experienced and new coaches; called for consistency across organizations in terms of requirements for coaches’ preparation; and recommended board members’ greater presence at practices and games. Wiersma and Sherman also point to the benefits of season-long and even year-round educational opportunities for coaches, and also of university-community collaboration to devise and implement sound programs and policies. They argue that the content of coaching educational programs should suit the age, gender, and athletic level of an organization’s players. Finally, Wiersma and Sherman suggest, and the present researchers agree, that the purview of conduct codes for players’ parents should be limited to behavior that is observable, and that codes should accommodate “objective enforcement”

References

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Sports Medicine and Fitness & Committee on School Health. (2001, June). Organized sports for children and preadolescents. Pediatrics, 107(6), 1459–1462. Retrieved March 28, 2008, from http:// aappolicy. aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/pediatrics;107/6/1459

National Alliance for Youth Sports. (n.d.) Recommendations for communities. Retrieved January 1, 2006, from http://www.nays.org/nays_community_recommendations.pdf

Clark, M. A. (2000). Who’s coaching the coaches? In J. R. Gerdy (Ed.) Sport in school: The future of an institution (pp. 55-65). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

Criminal and sex offender registry search tool available to local Little Leagues (2005). Little League Baseball, Updated January 7, 2005.

DeRenne, C., & House, T. (1993). Play ball: The new baseball basics for youth coaches, parents, and kids. Minneapolis, MN: West.

Gilbert, G., Gilbert, J., & Trudel, P. (2001). Coaching strategies for youth sports. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 72(5), 41–46.

Gould, D., Krane, V., Giannini, J., & Hodge, K. (1990). Educational needs of elite U.S. national team, Pan American, and Olympic coaches. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 9, 332–344.

Martens, R. (2004). Successful coaching. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Martens, R., Flannery, T., & Roetert, P. (2003). The future of coaching education in America. Retrieved September 15, 2004, from http://www.nfhs.org/cep/articles/futurecoaching.htm

National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (1995). National standards for athletic coaches. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

Weiss M., & Hayashi, C. (1996). The United States. In P. DeKnop, L. M. Engstrom, B. Skirstad, & R. Weiss (Eds.), Worldwide trends in youth sport (pp. 43–57). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Wiersma, L., & Sherman, C. (2005). Volunteer youth sport coaches’ perspectives of coaching education/certification and parental codes of conduct. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 324–338.

Author’s Note: Correspondence for this article should be sent to Coop DeRenne,
Associate Professor, University of Hawaii, KLS Department, 1337 Lower Campus Rd.
Honolulu, Hawaii 96822. Email: Coop@Hawaii.edu.

2015-10-22T23:43:39-05:00April 2nd, 2008|Sports Coaching, Sports Facilities, Sports Management|Comments Off on National and State Youth Baseball Coaching Requirements: A State Case Study
Go to Top