Table 3.0: Significant mean difference, effect size and 95% confidence intervals in MBSRQ subscales between powerlifting, active subjects and body image groups SUBSCALE GROUP CONTRAST MEAN DIFFERENCE (SE) EFFECT SIZE 95% CI AE Powerlifting Versus Active Subjects 0.63 (0.16) * 0.34 [0.102, 1.142] AE Active Subjects Versus Body Image -0.63 (0.22* 0.31 [-1.329, -0.103] FE Active Subjects Versus Body Image -0.51 (0.19) * 0.31 [-0.859, 0.093] FO Powerlifting Versus Active Subjects 0.55 (0.11) * 0.46 [0.215, 0.889] HE Powerlifting Versus Active Subjects 0.45 (0.14) * 0.32 [-0.883, -0.019] OWP Powerlifting Versus Active Subjects -0.51 (0.16) * 0.27 [-1.033, 0.005] SCW Powerlifting Versus Active Subjects 0.32 (0.11) * 0.25 [-0.041, 0.687] SCW Powerlifting Versus Body Image 0.54 (0.15) * 0.43 [-0.926, -0.158] BASS Powerlifting Versus Active Subjects 0.45 (0.13) * 0.32 [0.039, 0.866] BASS Active Subjects Versus Body Image -0.52 (0.17) * 0.33 [-1.083, 0.028] Table 3.0 shows the mean differences, between the groups, effect sizes and confidence intervals. In total there was 3 significant effects (AE, FE and BASS) recorded for the Active Subjects group against the Body Image group. 6 significant effects (AE, FO, HE, OWP, SCW and BASS) recorded for the Powerlifting group against the Active Subjects group. Finally, 1 significant effect (SCW) record for the Powerlifting group against the Body Image group. The following scale denotes significance level * p < 0.05, **p

Print Friendly, PDF & Email