Authors: Giovanni Ficarra1, Fabio Trimarchi1, Alessandra Bitto2, Debora Di Mauro1
1Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Sciences,
2Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, c/o AOU Policlinico G. Martino, Via C. Valeria, Gazzi, 98125, Messina, Italy.
Prof. Alessandra Bitto, MD, PhD
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina
Torre Biologica 5th floor, “AOU” Policlinico G. Martino
Via C. Valeria, Gazzi, 98125 Messina, Italy
Giovanni Ficarra, MSc, is a PhD student at the University of Messina, Italy. He holds a degree in Sports Science and his research interests focus on teaching physical activity with the particular attention to rowing to adolescents, and sport-related measurement issues especially in experimental settings.
Fabio Trimarchi, MD, PhD, is a Full Professor of Biomechanics at the University of Messina, Italy. His research interests focus on the mechanical aspects of human body and he is in charge for the outpatient of Sport Medicine at the University Hospital of Messina.
Debora Di Mauro, PharmD, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Sport Methodology at the University of Messina, Italy. His research interests focus on the methodological aspects of teaching sport.
Alessandra Bitto, MD, PhD is a Full Professor of Pharmacology at the University of Messina, Italy. Her research is focused on the effects of drugs and supplements on various aspects of diseases, she also shares research interest on experimental training protocols to ameliorate drug response.
ROWING PERFORMANCE FOLLOWING A SINGLE TEACHING SESSION IN SCHOOL CHILDREN
Purpose: The teaching of sport activities during childhood is fundamental to improve their fitness levels, but also to promote inclusion, sense of responsibility and self-discipline. In many countries physical activity based educational programs include rowing among the disciplines that schools promote and support. In Italy, rowing is not included in the common school activities; thus, we carried out a pilot project in a secondary school in Sicily to evaluate the efficacy of teaching and learning of the basic concepts of rowing technique in school pre-adolescents exposed to rowing for the first time.
Methods: After a 2-hour teaching session, a short survey was administered, and the 20 seconds maximum speed test was performed by 62 schoolchildren (12-14 years of age) of both sexes.
Results: Despite some difference in anthropometric characteristics, and in the retention of the information provided before the questionnaire, no significant difference between male and female students was observed in the 20 second all-out test.
Conclusions, and Applications in Sport: Rowing could be easily performed by all school kids and should be included in the physical activities performed at school to improve not only their physical skills but also their wellbeing.
Key Words: Ergometer test, adolescents, coaching, speed test, questionnaire
Exercise and physical activity are of main importance during the scholar age and adolescence to strengthen personality and for a proper psycho-physic balance, but also to improve the quality of life and the social skills of children (1). Regular physical activity is the best antidote to eliminate obesity and maintain an acceptable body weight. It also provides a positive alternative to sedentary activities, in addition children learn the fundamental motor skills that enable them to develop the competence that creates confidence and leads to safe and successful participation in a wide range of sports (2,3). Children improve their fitness levels, including muscular and cardiovascular endurance, strength, and flexibility, they can learn valuable lessons about accepting responsibility for their personal development leading to greater self-discipline. They learn what means to be cooperative and competitive and to face up to different challenges both as individuals and in groups for developing both leadership and cooperation skills (4,5).
To this end rowing has an emerging role among those activities that can be successfully performed by all kind of children, including those with mental or physical disabilities. It is well known that during the scholar age and especially adolescence sport practice is quite important. Rowing in particular may be one of those disciplines that are specifically involved in the development of personality and social skills (6). Despite these beneficial effects, it has also been shown that intense training and an elevated number of competitions during young age might also contribute to psychological distress, burnout and dropping out of sports (7), for this reason team sports are usually preferred to individual sports. In this context, coaches have a fundamental role in terms of providing support, motivation, engagement, and confidence to their athletes, especially at young age (8). In the Training of Young Athletes Study it has been demonstrated that while parents exerted the strongest influence on the initiation of a sport (either team or individual sport), coaches were the strongest influence on kids’ decision to perform intense training (9), further indicating the importance of specialized coaching activities.
As a matter of fact, rowing is not only an individual sport but can be done in a team and usually training is done in a class setting; in this context rowing can help build social skills because rowers help each other to reach their goals, they experience the meaning of being a crucial part of a team, and they work together to build relationships.
In terms of physical activity, rowing has unique features, in fact it allows to exercise all major muscle groups: legs, back and arms are engaged while rowing. In addition, rowing is a low-impact sport that can be afforded by people of various fitness levels and if executed properly, the rowing stroke is a fairly safe motion. It is very unlikely that rowers experience serious injuries as compared to contact and high-impact sports. These are some of the reasons that have led to the inclusion of rowing activities in many schools of the United Kingdome with longstanding positive feedback from either student and their parents. In Italy rowing is not included in the common school activities and very recently the Italian Rowing Federation (FIC) has started a project for school children and adolescents to promote rowing and its positive values. As part of this objective, we carried out a pilot project at the secondary school “Evemero” (Messina, Italy) to evaluate the efficacy of teaching and learning of the basic concepts of rowing technique in school pre-adolescents exposed to rowing for the first time.
Several observations have reported sex differences in motor learning and performance during growth, with mixed results that may reflect the different variables considered. This different ability to learn a new motor skill is related to the development of central nervous system as well as to the presence of sex hormones (10). Also, the instructional approach method provides different timings and pattern of learning, just like feedback (FB) that is one of the most important instructional tactics to improve learning (11). Verbal feedback is the primary tool used by a coach to help improve a rower’s technique and performance, and the ability of FB retention is related to some factors such as memory capacity, attention, concentration, and motivation (12). In fact, it is known that, especially in physical education and coaching (12-14), part of the information is not retained by the subjects.
In agreement with this, the aim of this pilot project was to evaluate the ability of motor learning and performance in school pre-adolescents exposed to rowing for the first and only time and to assess a possible inclusion of the discipline in the context of curricular activities.
To enable a comparison of the skill development between male and female, we used the 20 seconds maximum speed test and a questionnaire to evaluate the ability to retain the basics of this sport and a physical test using the ergometer to appraise the differences in both gender performances.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
In this study, a total of 62 students at the secondary school “Evemero” (Messina, Italy) have been enrolled. Subjects were both male (36) and female (26) and only the 19% of female and the 38% of male students was doing some sport. The most popular sports were soccer (30%), basket (17%), swimming (14%), and tennis (11%).
A complete explanation about the rowing technique using the ergometer was provided to the students, using as visual support two ergometers (Concept2, Concept, Italy) and of a rowing single scull boat with a pair of oars. The rowing technique on the ergometer was explained using a prescribing method, the coach provided explanations regarding the types of boats and oars and why is important to train also using an ergometer. The ergometer technique was described while the coach was performing a brief training explaining the importance of the sitting position that must be firmly hold so that the stroke will be efficient and so that he or she protects the back from injury. The position (angle) of the hips and its effect on the lower back is important to avoid damages to the spine. The hips should be tilted in such a way that the lower back is in ‘neutral’, that is to say the lumbar vertebrae are slightly concave. Then the seat moves forward and backward using the propulsive effect of the legs that push against the foot stretcher, the complete movement includes the so-called drive using both arms and the abdomen. During rowing the athlete performs 2 consecutive set of movements, the first is called drive (catch, when ideally the blade of the oar takes the water) and the recovery (finish, when ideally the athlete uses arms to pull the oar outside water).
If the movement is performed maintaining a strong position and a correct angle there is no risk of harm to the spine. When the coach ended the practical explanation a 10-question questionnaire with multiple choices (Table 1) and an open question was administered to the students, to evaluate the ability to retain the provided information. Right after the test, the students performed a physical test using the ergometer and the performances have been recorded.
Before performing the test, each student had a couple of minutes to adjust in the correct sitting position and the movements were explained to avoid inappropriate postures using a verbal feedback approach. When the kid was ready to perform the test, he/she was instructed to row at the maximum speed for 20 secs on the ergometer. The distance in meters displayed on the screen of the ergometer at the end of the test was recorded in a file.
The obtained data were tested for normality with the Kolmorogov-Smirnoff test and then analyzed with the unpaired T-test, and expressed as means and SEM. The statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
The mean age of recruited subjects was of 13.11 ± 0.10 and 12.93 ± 0.16 years for male and female students, respectively. The mean weight of students was 49.79 ± 1.72 and 46.94 ± 1.94 kg for males and females, respectively. As regarding to height, the mean was 1.55 ± 0.01 and 1.52 ± 0.01 m for males and females, respectively.
The evaluation of heights and weights of the enrolled adolescents showed that boys where significantly taller than girls (p<0.01), but no difference was observed in weights between the two groups (Figure 1).
Efficacy of teaching and feedback on the 20 seconds test
Despite none of the students was ever being exposed to rowing, all of them kept a correct sitting position during the test thanks to the verbal feedback provided before starting. Also during the test some additional feedback was offered to correct the position of the arms. As a result of the positive reinforcement obtained through verbal feedback, all kids performed quite well covering a mean distance of 60 meters. Age matched rowing athletes can cover up to 90 meters when performing the same kind of test.
A further proof of the effectiveness of the teaching method was provided by the observation that no significant differences on covered meters was recorded between male and female students, suggesting that the known gender differences are not clearly evident in the early pubertal age and do not affect the efficacy of the “drive” (Figure 2).
Evaluation of the questionnaire
The test to evaluate the ability to retain the information regarding rowing technique has been done before the 20 seconds test students had 10 minutes to complete all the answers. Analyzing the test to every correct answer was assigned the score of 1 and 0 for the wrong ones, while the open field answer was not included in the evaluation but used to understand if students appreciated this kind of experience.
No difference was observed between male and female students that mainly retained all the basics provided (Figure 3).
The results obtained in this study demonstrated a lack in gender differences in terms of physical performance at the ergometer. It has been demonstrated that no differences have been noted for the distance covered (mean values 67.8 and 68.1) between kids that already practice some sport and those who did not, suggesting that despite the exercise could influence some parameters (as endurance), did not change the performance in the maximum speed test. This specific kind of test has been used because is especially important to evaluate the anaerobic effort of an athlete (15), thus this test was the best one also for kids never exposed to rowing before.
A previous study from Mikulic and coworkers (16) in adolescent rowing athletes with an age span of 12-18 years demonstrated some significant differences between male (n=297) and female (n=193) since the age of 13 with a peak in the performance at the age of 15. It is possible to speculate that the results differ from the present ones for two main reasons: the number of enrolled subjects and the age span. As a matter of fact, with a bigger number of subjects and a wider distribution of ages it is possible to appreciate differences that with small numbers could not be appreciated. Another difference relies in the kind of test that has been performed, the Wingate test where the subjects perform a 30 second maximum speed test, but after a warm-up and this allows to record the peak performance, which is an index of fatigue, so this test is a bit different from our test. In rowing, multiple physiological, psychological, and technical factors are known to contribute to performance, it is however very subjective and difficult to quantify each determinant as a matter-of-fact boat races rely on both on-water and team dynamics which are quite difficult to reproduce on land (17). This represents the major reason for searching a standardized test method to predict performance. As previously shown short tests (i.e., 50-m, 100-m, or 500-m) performed on a rowing ergometer under anaerobic stimuli should be taken into consideration during the process of selection and orientation of young rowers and can be used in large context as schools when starting the recruitment of new athletes (18-20).
For the same reason, the Wingate test adapted for rowing on longer indoor distances, as 1500 m, can be useful for rowing coaches when dealing with competitive adolescent rowers to identify talents, as previously demonstrated (21). On the other hand, elite young rowers’ performances can be predicted with the 60 s test that well correlates with the 2000 m performance (21).
In another study (22) the force in Watt obtained by male and female rowers was evaluated to understand if there were differences according to the rowing technique. In this study 13 female and 10 male young adults (mean age 25 years) men produced more watts than women, but women had a better hip rotation that allowed to a produce a drive of a similar intensity. Despite the study has been performed on rowers and of a different age it indicates that gender differences could be kept to a minimum if technique is appropriately performed.
The lack of technique of the subjects of the present study might also account for the lack of difference in the results, despite male being significantly taller than female adolescents could be advantaged. As a matter of fact, subjects with longer arms and legs could perform a more efficient drive, but this advantage could be a downside if the technique is poorly performed (23).
Recently, several studies have addressed the role of physical activity in adolescent for health promotion, including studies focusing on the improvement and evaluation of specific school-based intervention strategies. Although school-based interventions are considered the most practicable and applicable way to avoid low physical activity levels, there is no agreement about optimal intervention strategies (24). Physical education at school should focus on improving the enthusiasm of children and adolescents in performing sports and physical activity throughout their adult life (25) to make them more skilled and to empower them, especially girls. Physical activity is considered as the vehicle through which students improve knowledge, skills, and attitudes to lead healthy lifestyles; in this regard, coaches have both instructional and motivational tasks which are fundamental to enhance skill acquisition. Outdoor physical activity-based interventions during leisure time that generate fun, enjoyment and interest are aimed at fostering the use of self-regulation skills to promote and increase regular physical activity of students outside school (26). Rowing is one of the sports that better conjugate the pleasure of an outdoor activity with the educational concepts, as the enjoyment and respect for the environment; and provides an atmosphere that encourages adolescents to engage in physical activity. Moreover, rowing is well accepted and largely performed also by girls that usually show less engagement in physical activity as compared to boys, due to psychosocial factors. Indeed, a recent paper demonstrated a steady decrease in the sex difference across years in collegiate rowing, which was paralleled by an increase in participation of the women relative to the men in collegiate rowing (27).
In conclusion this study does not provide proof of gender differences in the analyzed subjects suggesting that rowing could be easily performed by school kids to improve not only their physical skills but also their wellbeing.
CONCLUSION AND APPLICATIONS TO SPORT
The study results demonstrated that in a naive population of 11-13 years old with similar anthropometric characteristics between male and female, the 20 seconds test is still an appropriate method to evaluate the anaerobic capacity but may not be the ideal test for identifying differences in performance between male and female never exposed to rowing. Additionally, it is worth of note that the teaching of physical activity needs some improvement at least in countries where is not included in primary school programs, as for instance in Italy. In fact, the learning ability of a motor scheme is maximal during the first 10 years of age as compared to adulthood (28), for this reason teaching a sport that requires specific motor skills, as rowing, will be optimal if started at a young age.
The authors are thankful to Dr Rita Lauro for her support in searching the references.
No funding was received to perform this study
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest
Availability of data
The authors have the original data set on file
Conceptualization and writing: GF, AB.
Data acquisition and analysis: GF, AB.
Critical revision: FT, DDM.
Consent to participate
All children’s parents have signed an informed consent which is recorded on file.
1. Donnelly, J. E., & Lambourne, K. (2011). Classroom-based physical activity, cognition, and academic achievement. Preventive Medicine, 52 Suppl 1, S36-42
2. Han, A., Fu, A., Cobley, S., & Sanders, R. H. (2018). Effectiveness of exercise intervention on improving fundamental movement skills and motor coordination in overweight/obese children and adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of science and medicine in sport, 21(1), 89–102.
3. Barnett, L. M., Lai, S. K., Veldman, S., Hardy, L. L., Cliff, D. P., Morgan, P. J., Zask, A., Lubans, D. R., Shultz, S. P., Ridgers, N. D., Rush, E., Brown, H. L., & Okely, A. D. (2016). Correlates of Gross Motor Competence in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 46(11), 1663–1688.
4. Committee on Physical Activity and Physical Education in the School Environment; Food and Nutrition Board; Institute of Medicine; Kohl HW III, Cook HD, editors. Educating the Student Body: Taking Physical Activity and Physical Education to School. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2013 Oct 30. 3, Physical Activity and Physical Education: Relationship to Growth, Development, and Health. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK201497/
5. Bessa, C., Hastie, P., Araújo, R., & Mesquita, I. (2019). What Do We Know About the Development of Personal and Social Skills within the Sport Education Model: A Systematic Review. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 18(4), 812–829.
6. Wall, M., & Côté, J. (2007). Developmental activities that lead to dropout and investment in sport. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 12(1), 77–87.
7. Hill, G. M., & Simons, J. (1989). A Study of the Sport Specialization on High School Athletics. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 13(1), 1–13.
8. Baxter-Jones, A. D. G., Maffulli, N., & TOYA Study Group. (2003). Parental influence on sport participation in elite young athletes. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 43(2), 250–255.
9. Deaner, R. O., Balish, S. M., & Lombardo, M. P. (2016). Sex differences in sports interest and motivation: An evolutionary perspective. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 10(2), 73–97.
10. Murillo Pardo, B., García Bengoechea, E., Generelo Lanaspa, E., Bush, P. L., Zaragoza Casterad, J., Julián Clemente, J. A., & García González, L. (2013). Promising school-based strategies and intervention guidelines to increase physical activity of adolescents. Health Education Research, 28(3), 523–538.
11. Mesquita, I., Rosado, A., Januário, N., & Barroja, E. (2008). Athlete’s Retention of a Coach’s Instruction Before a Judo Competition. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 7(3), 402–407.
12. Januário, N., Rosado, A., Mesquita, I., Gallego, J., & Aguilar-Parra, J. M. (2016). Determinants of feedback retention in soccer players. Journal of Human Kinetics, 51, 235–241.
13. Rosado, A., Mesquita, I., Breia, E., & Januário, N. (2008). Athlete’s Retention of Coach’s Instruction on Task Presentation and Feedback. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 8(1), 19–30.
14. Cataldo, A., Cerasola, D., Zangla, D., Traina, M. (2021). Potenza ai remi. Relazione tra potenza anaerobica e prestazione in giovani canottieri: Come programmare e monitorare l’allenamento. Sport & Medicina, 6, 29–30.
15. Mikulic, P., & Markovic, G. (2011). Age- and gender-associated variation in maximal-intensity exercise performance in adolescent rowers. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 32(5), 373–378.
16. McGregor, A. H., Patankar, Z. S., & Bull, A. M. J. (2008). Do men and women row differently? A spinal kinematic and force perspective. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 222(2), 77–83.
17. Cataldo, A., Cerasola, D., Russo, G., Zangla, D., & Traina, M. (2015). Mean power during 20 sec all-out test to predict 2000 m rowing ergometer performance in national level young rowers. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 55(9), 872–877.
18. Riechman, S. E., Zoeller, R. F., Balasekaran, G., Goss, F. L., & Robertson, R. J. (2002). Prediction of 2000 m indoor rowing performance using a 30 s sprint and maximal oxygen uptake. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20(9), 681–687.
19. Cerasola, D., Bellafiore, M., Cataldo, A., Zangla, D., Bianco, A., Proia, P., Traina, M., Palma, A., & Capranica, L. (2020). Predicting the 2000-m Rowing Ergometer Performance from Anthropometric, Maximal Oxygen Uptake and 60-s Mean Power Variables in National Level Young Rowers. Journal of Human Kinetics, 75, 77–83.
20. Jensen, K., Frydkjær, M., Jensen, N. M. B., Bannerholt, L. M., & Gam, S. (2021). A Maximal Rowing Ergometer Protocol to Predict Maximal Oxygen Uptake. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 16(3), 382–386.
21. Maciejewski, H., Rahmani, A., Chorin, F., Lardy, J., Giroux, C., & Ratel, S. (2016). The 1,500-m Rowing Performance is Highly Dependent on Modified Wingate Anaerobic Test Performance in National-Level Adolescent Rowers. Pediatric Exercise Science, 28(4), 572–579.
22. Hagerman, F. C., Addington, W. W., & Gaensler, E. A. (1972). A comparison of selected physiological variables among outstanding competitive oarsmen. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 12(1), 12–22.
23. Molea, V., Zangla, D., Benecchi, A. (2014). I fondamenti del canottaggio italiano. Federazione Italiana Canottaggio, 1. Retrieved 24 June 2022, from https://canottaggio.portaletrasparenza.net/dettagli/bando/81
24. Kriemler, S., Meyer, U., Martin, E., van Sluijs, E. M. F., Andersen, L. B., & Martin, B. W. (2011). Effect of school-based interventions on physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents: A review of reviews and systematic update. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(11), 923–930.
25. Kahn, E. B., Ramsey, L. T., Brownson, R. C., Heath, G. W., Howze, E. H., Powell, K. E., Stone, E. J., Rajab, M. W., & Corso, P. (2002). The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 22(4 Suppl), 73–107.
26. Haug, E., Torsheim, T., Sallis, J. F., & Samdal, O. (2010). The characteristics of the outdoor school environment associated with physical activity. Health Education Research, 25(2), 248–256.
27. Keenan, K. G., Senefeld, J. W., & Hunter, S. K. (2018). Girls in the boat: Sex differences in rowing performance and participation. PLoS ONE, 13(1), e0191504.
28. Borrego-Balsalobre, F.J., Martínez-Moreno, A., Morales-Baños, V., & Díaz-Suárez, A. (2021). Influence of the Psychomotor Profile in the Improvement of Learning in Early Childhood Education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12655. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312655.